Shawn Zelig Aster, «Israelite Embassies to Assyria in the First Half of the Eighth Century», Vol. 97 (2016) 175-198
This article shows that the kingdom of Israel sent ambassadors on an annual basis to the Assyrian empire during much of the reign of Jeroboam II, and it explores the implications of these contacts for the interpretation of Isaiah 1–39 and Hosea. These diplomatic contacts are based on points Fales has raised regarding nimrud Wine List 4 (ND 6212), whose importance for biblical studies has hitherto not been recognized. The recipients of the wine rations in this list are to be identified as ambassadors of weaker kingdoms, among them Samaria, who visited Assyria to pay tribute.
196 SHAWn ZeLIG ASTeR
apparent Assyrian invincibility poses to the doctrine of yHWH’s om-
nipotence. He addresses directly the Assyrian claims of empire and
imperial ideology in many of his prophecies. In 7,17 and 8,5-8,
prophecies which relate to the period of the Syro-ephramite crisis
in 738-734, he describes Assyria as having been sent by yHWH 70. Isa
19,19, with its unique mention of a “monument to the LoRD on the
border of egypt”, seems to appropriate and attribute to yHWH the stele
established by Tiglath-Pileser III on the border between egypt and the
Land of Israel during his 734 campaign 71. In Isaiah 10,5-34, which
seems to date to the period of Sargon, an anti-Assyrian theology is
articulated, in which motifs which express Assyrian power in the royal
inscriptions are re-formulated to indicate Assyria’s coming defeat 72.
This approach reaches its height in the narrative of the events of
Sennacherib’s campaign, which subverts Assyrian expressions of
power in Isa 37,24-26 73. Such expressions are subverted to express
the enduring power of yHWH in Isa 2,5-22, a prophecy which seems
unrelated to any specific event, but rather a reflection on a series
of Assyrian campaigns 74. But Hosea nowhere engages with the
challenges that Assyrian imperial ideology poses to “yHWH-alone”
monotheism. Perhaps Israel’s long experience with expressions of
Assyrian imperial ideology led Israelites, including Hosea’s audience,
to take such expressions “with a grain of salt”, and to view them more
cynically and critically.
It is interesting that in contrast to the many studies of Isaiah’s in-
teraction with Assyrian royal inscriptions, only some of which are cited
above, Hosea’s use of phrases taken from Assyrian sources or his re-
sponses to Assyrian claims of empire have not received great attention
70
MACHInIST, “Assyria and its Image in the First Isaiah”, 728.
71
Summary Inscription 8, line 18’. For a fuller discussion of this passage, see
S.Z. ASTeR, “Isaiah 19: The Burden of egypt and neo-Assyrian Imperial Policy”,
JAOS 135 (2015) 453-470.
72
on the dating of parts of this passage, see J.J.M. RoBeRTS, First Isaiah
(Hermeneia; Minneapolis, Mn 2015) 166; and on the use of Assyrian material,
see M. CHAn, “Rhetorical Reversal and Usurpation: Isaiah 10:5-34 and the Use
of neo-Assyrian Royal Idiom in the Construction of an Anti-Assyrian Theology”,
JBL 128 (2009) 717-733.
73
S.Z. ASTeR, “What Sennacherib Said and What the Prophet Heard: on the
Use of Assyrian Sources in the Prophetic narrative of the Campaign of 701 BCe”,
Shnaton 19 (2009) 105-124 (Hebrew), and in the same narrative, W. GALLAGHeR,
Sennacherib’s Campaign to Judah, 205-216.
74
S.Z. ASTeR, “The Image of Assyria in Isaiah 2:5-22: The Campaign Motif
Reversed”, JAOS 127 (2007) 249-278.