Sjef van Tilborg, «The Danger at Midday: Death Threats in the Apocalypse», Vol. 85 (2004) 1-23
This paper proposes a new suggestion in the discussion regarding possible death threats in the Apocalypse. It makes a comparison between relevant texts from the Apocalypse and what happens during festival days when rich civilians entertain their co-citizens with (gladiatorial) games. At the end of the morning and during the break special fights are organized. Condemned persons are forced to fight against wild animals or against each other to be killed by the animals or by fire. The paper shows that a number of texts from the Apocalypse are better understood, when they are read against this background.
The Danger at Midday: Death Threats in the Apocalypse 13
Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to
throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and for ten days
you will have tribulation. Be faithful unto death, and I will give you
the crown of life (3,10).
The text makes a combination of suffering, imprisonment, 10 days
of hardship, death threat and crowning. It is a cluster of successive
happenings which is to be understood from what happens at the
midday intermission at the munera: namely the public execution of
convicts of low social status who had been condemned ad bestias, ad
flammas (or ad gladium).
For this to be understood, I have first to go still more extensively
into what we know of what happens during this midday break.
4. The meridiani
a) Description
I would like to begin with the expressive description of it which is
to be found in Seneca, Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium 7:
By chance I attended a mid-day exhibition, expecting some fun, wit,
and relaxation, — an exhibition at which men’s eyes have respite from
the slaughter of their fellow-men. But it was quite the reverse. The
previous combats were the essence of compassion; but now all trifling
is put aside and it is pure murder. The men have no defensive armour.
They are exposed to blows at all points, and no one ever strikes in
vain. Many persons prefer this programme to the usual pairs and to the
bouts “by requestsâ€. Of course they do; there is no helmet or shield to
deflect the weapon. What is the need of defensive armour, or of skill?
All these mean delaying death. In the morning they throw men to the
lions and the bears; at noon, they throw them to the spectators. The
spectators demand that the slayer shall face the man who is to slay him
in his turn; and they always reserve the latest conqueror for another
butchering. The outcome of every fight is death, and the means are fire
and sword. This sort of things goes on while the arena is empty. You
may retort: “But he was a highway robber; he killed a man!†And what
of it… In the morning they cried ‘Kill him! Lash him! Burn him…and
when the games stop for the intermission, they announce: ‘A little
throat-cutting in the meantime, so that there may still be something
going on!’(40)
The description of Seneca is not quite typical. What it is about here
is pretty well a man-to-man fight in which the condemned, because he
is unarmed, does not have the ghost of a chance. From mosaics and a
(40) See especially BARTON, The Gladiator and the Monster, 16-25.