Jean-Noël Aletti, «Galates 1–2. Quelle fonction et quelle démonstration?», Vol. 86 (2005) 305-323
This article is an attempt to show the following: (1) Galatians 1,11–2,21 is a
unified argument in which vv. 11-12 constitute the propositio; (2) Gal 2,14b-21
represent a short speech bringing the argument to its climax, and (3) Gal 2,16
takes up the Jerusalem agreement about Paul’s Gospel and not only fulfills a
rhetorical function within the short speech of v. 14b-21 but also provides the
thesis of the argument that unfolds in Galatians 3–4.
388 Andrew E. Arterbury - William H. Bellinger, Jr.
the proper angle of vision for the entire psalm (9). Others have argued against
a worship context and instead believe Ps 23,5-6 reflects the perspective of an
individual pious Jew (10). Still others contend that the psalm is drawing upon
Exodus imagery in order to illuminate either the historical contexts of
pilgrimages to Jerusalem (11) or Israel’s return from exile (12).
Despite the validity of such questions about the original, historical, or
liturgical contexts of Ps 23,5-6, we prefer to postpone conversations about the
Sitz im Leben until after we have fully explored the imagery of the text itself.
In part, we are suggesting that scholars should first seek to understand the
metaphor of God as host in Ps 23,5-6 on its own terms before proceeding to
questions about the original context. Recently scholars have begun to ascribe
more significance to the metaphor of God as host in Ps 23,5-6 and, in some
cases, have also begun to recognize the link between the metaphor of God as
host and the ancient Israelite custom of hospitality (13). Yet, this link has not
been fully explicated.
2. The Custom of Hospitality in Ancient Israel
Unlike modern “hospitality†which may well be extended to one’s
neighbors, the ancient Israelite custom of hospitality revolved around the kind
treatment of strangers or travelers. In particular, both the worship of the Lord
and societal norms created the expectation that faithful Israelites should
supply passersby with both provisions and protection (14). Furthermore,
following the expected protocol, the hosts and guests often forged long-term,
reciprocal relationships in which both parties presumed the other’s assistance
whenever they were in their counterpart’s region (e.g., Josh 2,1-21;
9,6.11.15.18-21; Judg 4,17; 2 Kgs 4,8-10.25-31).
Quite appropriately, Abraham’s extension of gracious hospitality to the
three messengers of the Lord in Gen 18,1-33 becomes the paradigm for
ancient Israelite, Jewish, and early Christian hospitality (15). Abraham not only
greeted his guests with honor as he bowed down before them, but he also
provided them with an elaborate feast and an opportunity to rest from their
travels. Moreover, the elaborate feast that Abraham and Sarah prepared
included large portions of bread, a prepared calf, curds, and milk. Finally, in
the later traditions about Abraham’s hospitality, writers not only emphasize
(9) E.g., VOGT, “The ‘Place in Life’ of Ps 23â€, 195-211; and CRAIGIE, Psalms 1–50,
207-208; and MAYS, Psalms, 118.
(10) MORGENSTERN, “Psalm 23â€, 19-24; and KRAUS, Psalms 1–59, 306.
(11) FREEDMAN, “The Twenty-Third Psalmâ€, 139, 147; C.C. BROYLES, Psalms
(NIBCOT 11; Peabody, MA 1999) 123-125; and H. SCHMIDT, Die Psalmen (Tübingen
1934) 40.
(12) P.A. MILNE, “Psalm 23: Echoes of the Exodusâ€, SR 4/3 (1974-1975) 246; and M.S.
SMITH, “Setting and Rhetoric in Psalm 23â€, JSOT 41 (1988) 61-66.
(13) K. SCHAEFER, Psalms (Berit Olam; Collegeville, MN 2001) 58, 149; and
CRENSHAW, Psalms, 62.
(14) J. KOENIG, “Hospitalityâ€, Anchor Bible Dictionary (ed. D.N. FREEDMAN) (New
York 1992) III, 299.
(15) KOENIG, “Hospitalityâ€, 300. See also, A.E. ARTERBURY, “Abraham’s Hospitality
among Jewish and Early Christian Writers: A Tradition History of Genesis 18:1-16 and Its
Relevance for the Study of the New Testamentâ€, PRSt 30/3 (2003) 359-376.