Cornelis Bennema, «The Sword of the Messiah and the Concept of Liberation in the Fourth Gospel», Vol. 86 (2005) 35-58
This article elucidates the Johannine concept of Jesus’
"sword" as the means of liberation against a background of Palestinian messianic
apocalypticism. It is argued that the Johannine Jesus is depicted as a messiah
who liberates the world at large from the spiritual oppression of sin and the
devil by means of his Spirit-imbued word of truth. In addition, Jesus also
provides physical, social, religious and political liberation. Jesus’ programme
of holistic liberation is continued by his disciples through the transference of
his "sword" in the form of their Paraclete-imbued witness.
The Sword of the Messiah 39
nations like Assyria and Babylon (13). Those who had remained
righteous (probably including the author and his circle) had to flee
(17,16-18), but their hope is in the messiah, the legitimate Davidic
king whom God will raise up to liberate “Israel†and to bring justice
and “peace†(17,21– 18,12) (14).
An important observation is that Psalms of Solomon does not
depict a conflict between the Jews and the Romans, but between the
righteous and the wicked. In Psalm 1, the author speaks as Jerusalem
personified and it is evident that not all Israelites had been righteous
and faithful (cf. 2,3) (15). The author is clear that, based on God’s
judgment, a sifting will take place between the righteous and the
sinner (2,33-35; cf. Pss 3–4; 13–15), between “the house of the
righteous/Israel†(3,6-8; 7,10; 9,11; 10,8; 17,42) and “the house of the
sinner†(12,3; 15,11). The righteous will be disciplined, purified and
“saved†but the sinner will be destroyed and go to Sheol (12,6; 13,7;
Pss 13–15). The a[rconte" represent the Jewish rulers who are
evaluated negatively (5,11; 8,16.20; 17,12.20.22.36) and hence are put
on the side of the sinner. Moreover, the people that are depicted
negatively in 1,8; 2,3; 4,1.8; 8,11-12; 17,6 probably refer to priests,
teachers of the law, rulers, etc. Thus, the righteous or “Israel†includes
the author and his community, and the sinner refers not only to the
Romans but also to the Hasmoneans and their supporters, i.e., the
Jewish ruling class.
Let us now return to Psalms 17–18 and examine the specific
activities of the messiah by which he will liberate “Israelâ€. These two
Psalms envisage a Davidic messiah who is endowed with the Spirit,
wisdom, understanding and might (17,21.37; 18,7), which echoes Isa
11,2. This messiah will destroy the wicked, judge the nations, liberate
“Israel†and rule over her as God’s appointed king (17,21-46; cf. Isa
11,4-9). That the psalmist does not have the entire restoration of Israel
in mind may be clear from the references to the judgment of the
arcwn who represents the Jewish ruling class (17,20.22.36), and of the
[
(13) In fact, Pompey was first welcomed by the Jewish rulers as the bringer of
“peace†(8,16-18), but this pax Romana is the ironical counterpart of the lasting
“peace†that the messiah will establish (17,26-32). Pompey’s assassination was
also considered as a judicial act of God (2,25-29). Atkinson, however, interprets
the “man foreign to our race†(17,7) as referring to Herod the Great (“Useâ€, 109).
(14) Hence, the psalmist and his group are quietists (cf. 12,5); they verbally
attack their enemies but have no realistic means to secure political control
(WRIGHT, “Psalmsâ€, II, 642-643).
(15) Cf. DE JONGE, “Psalmsâ€, 163; WRIGHT, “Psalmsâ€, II, 651.