Robert L. Mowery, «Paul and Caristanius at Pisidian Antioch», Vol. 87 (2006) 223-242
A recently-published Latin inscription from Pisidian Antioch refers to four
benefactions that a prominent citizen named Caristanius had provided to fulfill a
vow on behalf of the emperor Claudius. Since this inscription refers to the year
45/46 CE, it refers to benefactions that may have been provided near the time
when Paul arrived in the city. After surveying the contents of this inscription and
reviewing scholarly opinion concerning the date when Paul arrived, this paper
reflects on the ethnic diversity of first century Pisidian Antioch, the religious
beliefs reflected in Caristanius’ vow, the likely impact of his benefactions on the
residents of the city, and the possibility that he may have been one of “the leading
men of the city” mentioned in Acts 13,50.
238 Robert L. Mowery
If Paul preached in Pisidian Antioch sometime during the years 45-
48, as suggested by many scholars, he must have met people who had
frequently walked past the statue that Caristanius had erected and who
probably still remembered the games, sacrifices and venatio that
Caristanius had provided. These benefactions would have given the
people of Pisidian Antioch a memorable diversion from the humdrum
existence that characterized many of their lives. But the statue would
have reminded them of more than Caristanius’ benefactions, for it
would have trumpeted the power of Rome, the power of the emperor,
the power of the Roman legions, and, by implication, the divine power
that had protected the emperor and given him victory. The statue and
inscription thus implicitly lauded the power of a pagan divinity rather
than the God proclaimed by Paul (85).
4. According to Acts 13,50, the Jews incited “the devout women of
high standing†and “the leading men of the cityâ€, and they (who?) (86)
stirred up persecution against Paul and Barnabas and expelled them
from their territory. Given the likelihood that Acts 13,50 and 2 Tim
3,11 preserve independent traditions concerning persecution that Paul
encountered at Pisidian Antioch, it is reasonable to conclude, as argued
above, that Paul actually faced persecution in this city. Whether or not
“the devout women of high standing†and “the leading men of the cityâ€
actually played a role in this persecution is more difficult to determine;
given the absence of corroborating evidence, the most that can be said
is that it is possible that these two groups played such a role (87). If “the
leading men of the city†played such a role, one of these “leading menâ€
could well have been Caristanius.
The Caristanii were not the only prominent family in first century
Pisidian Antioch. Mitchell, for example, has highlighted the Sergii
Paulli. After citing evidence that associates this family with Pisidian
Antioch, Mitchell has speculated that L. Sergius Paullus, a prominent
family member who was proconsul of Cyprus at the time of the
Pauline mission (Acts 13,7), urged Paul to go to Pisidian Antioch, “no
(85) The speech that Paul is portrayed delivering in the synagogue in Pisidian
Antioch repeatedly proclaims the acts of God, for God is the grammatical subject
of more than a dozen third person verbs in this speech. See Acts 13,17-23.30.34-
35.37.
(86) Cf. BARRETT, Acts, I, 660.
(87) During the stories of other conflicts involving Paul in Acts 13-20, the
author of Acts sometimes portrayed the local authorities opposing Paul,
sometimes portrayed them adopting other stances, and sometimes did not mention
them. See vv. 14,1-6.19; 16,16-24.35-39; 17,1-9.13-14; 18,12-17; 19,23-41; 20,3.