A.E. Gardner, «Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5», Vol. 88 (2007) 222-233
The interpretation of almost every detail of the description on the bear in Daniel 7 is disputed by scholars, mainly because of the uncertainty about the background of the imagery of the beasts. The present paper reviews suggested backgrounds and shows that while many have some appropriate elements, they are unable to explain all the details of the beasts or their actions. The Bible is shown to be the source of all aspects of Dan 7,5. Proceeding from Hos 13,5, the author utilized prophecies of the downfall of Babylon, supplemented from elsewhere in the Bible, to paint his picture of the second beast who is to be identified as Media and Persia.
Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5 229
which, scholars deem should be identified with the figure who is “like a
bear†(51). Nevertheless, in the succession of the beasts the first represents
Babylon, as is clear from the many allusions in Daniel 7,4 to the description
of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 4. Therefore the second must represent Media
or Media and Persia. The bear (bd in Hebrew, as in Aramaic) is not linked to
any nation at all in biblical tradition, although, as a ferocious beast, it is paired
with the lion on several occasions (Lam 3,10; 1 Sam 17,34,36; Prov 28,15;
Isa 11,6-7; Amos 5,19; Hos 13,7-8). The Proverbs reference links their
aggressive nature with that of “a wicked ruler†indicating that the bear as well
as the lion could be understood as a cipher for a political leader. Two of the
texts (Lam 3,10; Hos 13,8) posit that God Himself can be to his people as a
bear. “Daniel†then had a difficult task ahead of him if he was to identify a
particular nation or nations with the bear. It is likely that he began by
searching the Biblical passages relating to the fall of Babylon, looking for an
indication that the “bear†was involved. It is my contention that the key text
used by Daniel is Isa 13,5, which led him to another text which mentions a
“bear†of a different kind.
They come from a far country (qjrm ≈ram)
from the utmost parts of heaven (µymçh hxqm)
Yahweh and the weapons of his indignation (wm[z ylkw)
to destroy the whole land (Isa 13,5).
This verse is related to verse 17 of the same chapter which says, “Behold
I will stir up the Medes against them (Babylon)...†(52). The Medes then are
one component of the “bearâ€. The reference in Isa 13,5 to “the utmost part of
heaven†led the author of Daniel to Job 38,32-33 which proves illuminating
for Dan 7,5 in a number of ways:
Can you guide Arcturus (çy[) with her sons?
Do you know the ordinances of heaven (µymç)?
Can you establish (µyçt) his dominion (wrfçm) in the earth?
(Job 38,32-33)
God is the one who guides Arcturus, which is either the constellation of
the Great Bear (Ursa Maior) or a star in it! Ursa Maior is a far northern
constellation and its situation fulfills the description in Isa 13,5 of the
conquerers coming from “the utmost part of heavenâ€. The Joban passage
appears in the context of God demonstrating to Job how much greater God’s
power is than that of a human being. In Biblical passages relating to the
downfall of Babylon through the advent of other nations it is emphasised that
God is the prime mover in bringing this about (Isa 13,17; 46,10-11; Jer 51,11).
In order to find out more about the “bear†it is necessary to discover the
(51) The question must be asked whether the second beast has some intrinsic qualities
which link it with the bear rather than the leopard, or alternatively does the third beast have
qualities which match the characteristics of a leopard better than those of a bear?
(52) Cf. also Jer 51,11 which says that God has “stirred up the spirit of the King of the
Medesâ€. CHARLES, Daniel, 178, refers fleetingly to Isa 13,17 and Jer 51,11 when he
comments on the phrase “three ribs were in its mouth†saying, “These words point to the
ravenous nature of the beast — an idea suggested by those passages of the prophets in
which the Medes are summoned to ravage Babylon (Isa 13,7, Jer 15,11.28)â€