Philippe Guillaume - Michael Schunck, «Job’s Intercession: Antidote to Divine Folly», Vol. 88 (2007) 457-472
This paper pinpoints how divine folly and human intercession mentioned in Job 42,8 are key concepts to unravel the meaning of the Book of Job. The Epilogue does not restore Job in his former position. Job is not healed but receives a new role as intercessor on behalf of his friends and by extension on behalf of everyone less perfect than he is. Understanding misfortune as the consequence of inescapable bouts of divine folly is the Joban way to account for humanity’s inability to comprehend the divinity.
Job’s Intercession: Antidote to Divine Folly 469
the link between the Epilogue’s explicit mention of divine folly and its
implicit reference in the Prologue. The devilish rhetoric of the narrator
misleads the audience in considering the question the satan puts to
YHWH “Is Job fearing Elohim for naught?†(Job 1,9) as the point of
the whole book. That Job is pious and therefore rich (Job 1,1-2), and
that Job may become impious once poor is but a foil. Job is well aware
that the wicked are doing very well (Job 21,7-26) and thus dispels all
suggestions that he considers his wealth as proof of his righteousness.
It was and still is common knowledge that the wicked prospers as
much as the righteous, if not more. The Book of Proverbs does claim
that wisdom rewards the righteous with wealth (Prov 8,18.20-21), but
who believes that the rich is necessarily righteous? It was probably
obvious to all that evil often pays, and for this reason the wise elders
of the Book of Proverbs concede that it is better to be poor because
honest (Prov 16,19; 19,1; 28,6) and to satisfy oneself with wisdom
rather than with gold (Prov 8,19). Proverbial wisdom admits that the
promises of wealth and happiness are incentives to seek wisdom rather
than guaranties for success.
It is thus illegitimate to conclude from a few verses in Job which
applaud examples of retribution as justice in action (Job 5,3-4) that the
wise elders of Israel had actually come to equate retribution and
justice (51). Such statements are caricatures, rhetorical devices that
should not be taken as reflecting the positions of particular teachers or
wisdom schools in Israel. Rather, it is the narrator who purposefully
introduces a false problem. YHWH and the satan debate an issue
which everyone knows to be a false dilemma. By this token, the entire
debate in the Prologue is for nothing, but not in vain since it prepares
the Epilogue’s verdict. The Epilogue puts a name on the foregone link
between piety and riches — folly — and pushes it in the divine sphere.
That Job is twice as rich at the end does not prove that piety leads to
prosperity in the end (52). The Epilogue has moved beyond reward, and
it is only when folly is attributed to the friends that the red herring of
the causal link between fortunes to piety remains, and that Job’s partial
——————
hand of God leads to his life-saving swallowing (Jon 2,1). Instead of divine folly,
Jonah discusses the inability to comprehend or to make sense of divine
compassion. At the end, divine compassion is no more predictable than divine
folly.
(51) As claimed by J.E. HARTLEY, “From Lament to Oath: A Study of
Progression in the Speeches of Jobâ€, The Book of Job (ed. W. BEUKEN), 99.
(52) CLINES, “Whyâ€, 18.