Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
550 Lars Kierspel
Mlakuzhyil respects the formal parallels between Jesus’
encounter with Nicodemus and John the Baptist’s dispute about
purification and observes their similar theme of “life.†Kinzer’s
structure simply places all of chapter 3 at the center without any
further distinctions. Our study of John 3 identified important
parallels and distinctions that justify a bipartite center as follows:
A Miracle in Cana (2,1-12)
B New Temple: Not in Jerusalem (2,13-22)
C Salvation: God loves the world and gave his Son/eternal life/see
‘kingdom of God’ (3,1-21)
C’ Judgment: God loves the Son and gave him pavnta/ life/‘see life’ (3,22-36)
B New Temple: Not in Gerizim (4,1-42)
A Miracle in Cana (4,43-54)
III. Theological Harvest of Literary Structure
1. The uniting thread in John 2–4 is an emphasis on the novelty
of Jesus when compared with existing Jewish and Gentile forms of
religion. Dodd masterfully brought out the larger “fundamental
truth†in John 2–4, namely “that Christ has come to inaugurate a new
order in religion†(103). Dodd finds this indicated by the (old) water
that turns into (new) wine, the new temple as foretold afterwards
(2,14-19), the new birth spoken of before Nicodemus, and the new
worship explained to the Samaritan woman (104). The Gospel offers a
narrative version of Paul’s proposition that “the old has gone, the
new has come†(2 Cor 5,17) (105).
2. Yet the contrast between old and new is too general and
captures, at best, only a part of the Gospel’s theological effort. I
suggest that the repeated characteristic of the new faith throughout
each component in John 2–4 is the contrast between physical and
spiritual. The physical temple is replaced with a person (2,13-
22+4,1-42). The physical birth is replaced with a spiritual one (3,1-
21). The physical baptism is submitted under the one through the
Holy Spirit (3,22-36). In one word, at the center of the new religion
introduced by Jesus stands a “dematerialization†of religion that
(103) DODD, Interpretation, 303.
(104) Ibid., 297. See also LINDARS, The Gospel of John, 70; BROWN, The Gospel
and Epistles of John, 16; BRUCE, The Gospel of John, 43-44; BEASLEY-MURRAY,
John, xci, 31.
(105) So CARSON, The Gospel According to John, 166.