Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
540 Lars Kierspel
(a) The Samaritan’s question about her mountain or Jerusalem as
the proper center for worship (4,20) recalls the previous cleansing of
the temple and Jesus’ replacement of it. The reference to “Jerusalemâ€
immediately preceding 4,20 is found in 2,13 and 2,23, thus framing the
account of the temple cleansing and forming a terminological link
between both stories. The reader, prepared by a sequential reading of
the Gospel, immediately identifies the woman’s lack of knowledge
since the raising of Jesus’ body, announced earlier in 2,19, renders her
alleged alternatives between Jerusalem or Samaria as outdated.
(b) Both stories date the upcoming shift of worship to the same
time. While the account of the first miracle makes only a negative
comment about the “hour†that has not arrived yet (2,4), Jesus
mentions after the temple cleansing that the raising of his body
constitutes the new temple in Jerusalem (2,19.21). And while the
Samaritans’ confession of Jesus as “Savior of the world†(4,42) already
realizes the new worship in spirit and truth (see also 4,23), the
reference to “the hour†in 4,21 points to Jesus’ departure from this
world (13,1) in the cross and resurrection as the moment in which Jesus
is lifted up and thus glorified (17,1) to receive the worship of his
disciples (64).
(c) Both stories center on a replacement motif as part of Jesus’
cultic criticism and temple Christology (see already 1,14.51). Worship
takes place neither in Jerusalem nor in Samaria, but Jesus’ body is the
new dwelling place of God (2,20-21). The “living water†motif in 4,10,
11 sets up an explicit contrast to Jacob’s well (4,6)/Israel’s religion
from which the woman draws her water as a Samaritan syncretist.
While various nuances of meaning can be connected with the motif of
“living water†(65), the quest within the context for the true place of
worship reminds of OT promises (Ezek 47,1-2; Joel 4,18; Zech 14,8)
that “combine the life-promoting water with the eschatological
(64) J. DENNIS, Jesus’ Death and the Gathering of True Israel. The Johannine
Appropriation of Restoration Theology in the Light of John 11.47-52 (WUNT
2.217; Tübingen 2006) 179 discusses 4,4-26 right after 2,13-22 and concludes that
the “essential theme then of 2,13-22 has been resumed in 4,23-24â€.
(65) DENNIS (Jesus’ Death, 178) lists associations of “living water†in Jewish
texts with God’s revelatory word (Isa 11,9; 55,1-11; Amos 8,11; Hab 2,14; Jer
51,16), wisdom (Prov 13,14; 16,22; 18,4), wisdom of the Torah (Sir 24,23-25; CD
6,4; 19,34), the eschatological Temple (Ezek 47,1-12; Joel 3,18; Zech 14,8;
1 Enoch 26,1-6; 11Q18 frag. 24.1), the purification of the Spirit in the day of
Israel’s restoration (Ezek 36,25-27; 1QS 3,6-9; 4,20-22).