Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
“Dematerializing†Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm 539
replace worship in the physical temple. The encounter with the
Samaritan woman and with Jesus’ disciples lends itself for a concentric
structure. After the introduction (4,1-4), the pericope develops as
follows:
A Meeting at the Well (4,5-8)
B Dialogue with the woman about Water (4,10-15)
C True worship explained by the Messiah (4,16-26)
B’ Dialogue with disciples about Bread (4,27-38)
A’ Meeting in the City (4,39-42) (62)
The parallels between the dialogues with the woman and the
disciples are particularly striking. Both contain a misunderstanding,
one about water (4,10), one about food (4,33). Both contain
astonishment about Jesus’ inclusivity, one with regard to non-Jews
(4,9), the other regarding women (4,27). The center lies in 4,16-24 in
which the dialogue develops from the personal adultery of the
woman (4,16-19) to the national idolatry of the Samaritans (4,20-26).
The key term proskunevw, ‘to worship,’ is used here nine out of
eleven times in the Gospel (63). After the woman recognizes that Jesus
is a prophet, she turns to the central religious conflict between Jews
and Samaritans: “Our fathers worshiped in this mountain, and you
people say that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to
worship†(4,20). Jesus responds that “an hour is coming when neither
in this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, shall you worship the Fatherâ€
(4,21) and that “the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit
and truth†(4,23).
a) Parallels between John 2,13-22 and 4,1-42
At least three links connect core elements of both stories with each
other.
(62) The proposal is mine, but leans mainly on J. BLIGH, “Jesus in Samariaâ€,
HeyJ 3 (1962) 329-346. A concentric structure for 4,1-42 is also proposed by J.P.
CAHILL, “Narrative Art in John IVâ€, RSB 2 (1982) 42; C.H. TALBERT, Reading
John. A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Fourth Gospel and the
Johannine Epistles (Macon, GA 2005) 126 (his structure has seven elements).
JULIAN, Jesus and Nicodemus, 272; M.L. COLOE, God Dwells with Us. Temple
Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel (Collegeville, MN 2001) 86-90; J. MCWHIRTER,
The Bridegroom Messiah and the People of God. Marriage in the Fourth Gospel
(SNTSMS 138; Cambridge 2006) 69; T.D. NILSEN, “The True and the False: The
Structure of John 4,16-26â€, BN 128 (2006) 61-64 even structures the center 4,16-
26, concentrically. S.T. UM, The Theme of Temple Christology in John’s Gospel
(LNTS 312; Edinburgh 2006) 188 finds an ABBA-pattern for John 4,23-24.
(63) John 4,20 (2x).21.22 (2x).23 (2x).24 (2x); 9,38; 12,20.