Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
“Dematerializing†Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm 541
Temple†(66) and thus presents “Jesus as the true temple who replaces
the old Temple as the source of eschatological life†(67). It is as the new
temple that Jesus inaugurates a new worship in Spirit and truth (4,23-
24) (68).
b) Further development in John 4,1-42
The dialogue with the Samaritan repeats the concept of replacement
as found in the temple cleansing (69) but expands it in various ways.
(a) Not only the Jewish temple in Jerusalem is replaced by Jesus,
but any Gentile temple as well. While the Samaritans do participate in
“Jacob’s well†and syncretize Israel’s faith, the racial distinction
expressed in 4,9 and the Samaritans’ acclamation of Jesus as “Savior of
the world†(4,42, not “the Jewsâ€) identify them as non-Jews and thus as
representatives of Gentiles. The Samaritan mountain of worship is
Gerizim but it remains unnamed in the text. This allows us to
understand Samaritans as representatives of any religion other than
Judaism that worships on any mountain other than Jerusalem, such as
Mount Olympus, the Acropolis in Athens, or even Capitoline hill in
Rome. Thus the new form of worship introduced by Jesus stands in
antithesis to any alternative location and practice of worship (70).
(b) John 2 focuses on the temple and John 4 on the antithesis between
(66) UM, The Theme of Temple Christology, 148, see 148-151.
(67) DENNIS, Jesus’ Death, 190. The significance of replacement is all the more
evident since, as McHugh observes, Jesus “bypasses the Jerusalem motif†in the
temple promise of Ezek 47,1-10 (and Zech 13,1; 14,8). J. MCHUGH, “‘In Him was
life’: John’s Gospel and the Parting of the Waysâ€, Jews and Christians. The Parting
of the Ways, A.D. 70 to 135 (ed. J. D.G. DUNN) (Grand Rapids, MI 1999) 135.
(68) For the replacement motif in the temple cleansing see especially C.
METZDORF, Die Tempelaktion Jesu. Patristische und historisch-kritische Exegese
im Vergleich (WUNT 168; Tübingen 2003) and now also B. THETTAYIL, In Spirit
and Truth. An Exegetical Study of John 4:19-26 and a theological Investigation of
the Replacement Theme in the Fourth Gospel (CBET 46; Leuven 2007), esp. part
II, pp. 231-471.
(69) Various scholars observed these terminological and conceptual links
between John 2,13-22 and 4,1-42 and understand them as part of a parallel
theological theme of new worship or, beyond that, as part of a larger temple
Christology in the Gospel: BLIGH, “Jesus in Samariaâ€, 337-338; TALBERT, Reading
John, 126; UM, The Theme of Temple Christology, 186; CARSON, The Gospel
According to John, 164.
(70) BLIGH (“Jesus in Samariaâ€, 338) comments that the question of temple
worship is answered here not just for Samaritans but “in principle for all future
Gentile Christiansâ€. The Samaritans in John 4 are quite frequently regarded as
representatives of the Gentile world. See DODD, Interpretation, 239.