Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
“Dematerializing†Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm 545
(e) In both monologues God ‘loves’ (ajgapavw) and (therefore)
‘gives’ (divdwmi) something, but the objects to these verbs are different,
if not even exactly reversed. In the first monologue, God loves “the
world†and gives his “Son†(3,16), a statement concerning salvation. In
the second monologue, God loves “the Son†and gives him pavnta,
including the world (v. 35), emphasizing judgment (see hJ ojrgh; tou'
qeou' in 3,35).
(f) Finally, the whole chapter is held together by the inclusio of the
phrases “see the kingdom of God†in 3,3 (ijdei'n th;n basileivan tou'
qeou') and “see life†in 3,36 (o[yetai zwhvn) (84). Both phrases
characterize true believing as a form of ‘seeing’ spiritual truth in
marked contrast to the “beholding†(qewrou'nte") of material signs that
previously caused Jesus’ suspicion about false faith (2,23) (85). Despite
some remaining questions (86), these and other formal and textual
parallels render the many source-critical theories of dislocation and
transposition within John 3 unconvincing (87).
b) The Central Significance of 3,13-21
The narratological and theological gravity in John 3 is found in
the monologues of 3,(11)13-21 and 3,31-36. These rich theological
expositions are prepared beforehand by the narration of action which
leads in turn to a dialogue, a typical development of Johannine
discourse (88). Although John the Baptist’s monologue in 3,31-36
might appear as a shortened “duplicate†of the speech in 3,13-21 (89),
it does not just repeat previous statements but has its own
contribution to make. Some important expressions and themes in the
Gospel are launched from this text, such as the rhvmata tou' qeou'
(3,33; 8,47) (90), the Father’s love for the Son (3,35; also 5,20; 10,17;
(84) FREY, Die johanneische Eschatologie, III, 244.
(85) See also JULIAN’s (Jesus and Nicodemus, 31-45) review of other proposals
for structuring John 3.
(86) See BROWN, The Gospel According to John, I, 135.
(87) For a brief review see JULIAN, Jesus and Nicodemus, 28-29.
(88) Brown counts the development from dialogue to monologue among the
characteristics of Johannine discourse. R.E. BROWN, The Gospel and Epistles of
John. A Concise Commentary (Collegeville, MN 1988) 19. See also John 5,1-9
(action: healing), 5,10-18 (dialogue), 5,19-47 (monologue).
(89) BROWN (The Gospel and Epistles of John, 19) finds “duplicate speechesâ€
in the Gospel of John and counts 3,31-36 among them.
(90) The rJh'mata of Jesus (5,47; 6,63.68; 8,20.47; 12,47.48; 15,7) are the
words of God (3,34; 17,8; see 14,10).