Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
544 Lars Kierspel
2,23–3,21 3,22-36
Narrative Exposition 2,23-25 (79) 3,22-24
Dialogue 3,1-12 3,25-30
Monologue 3,13-21 3,31-36
(b) There is the formal parallel of the introductory statements by
Nicodemus and John the Baptist in 3,2 (oujdei;" ga;r duvnatai ... poiei'n
... eja;n mhv ... and 3,27 (ouj duvnatai a[nqrwpo" lambavnein ... eja;n
mhv ...) (80).
(c) Both episodes operate with an antithesis between the physical
and the spiritual. Upon hearing of the need to be ‘born again/above,’
Nicodemus thinks of physical birth (3,4), yet Jesus talks about being
“born of water and Spirit†(3,5). When debating physical purification
with the Jews (peri; kaqarismou', 3,25), John the Baptist points to Jesus
who was sent by God to give “the Spirit without limit†(3,34) (81).
(d) Both dialogues turn into monologues (without a clear
transition, 3,13; 3,31) which themselves open “with a claim that Jesus
is the unique revealer of the heavenly (vv. 12-15.31-35)†(82) and finish
by contrasting faith and unbelief (3,18-21.36) (83). Much of the
vocabulary in the second monologue repeats that of the first one, such
as “from heaven†(3,31; 3,12 [ejpouravnia]. 13), “witness†that is not
received (3,11.32), “God sent†(3,17.34), “Spirit†(3,5-8.34), “to
believe†(3,16.18.36), and “eternal life†(3,12.15.16.18.36).
Johannesevangelium (ThKNT 4.1; Stuttgart 2000) I, 136; NA 27th or in 3,16; cf.
CARSON, The Gospel According to John, 203; L. MORRIS, The Gospel According
to John (Grand Rapids, MI 1995) 202.
(79) We have mentioned above that 2,23-25 is a bridge-passage that concludes
the account of the temple-cleansing and, at the same time, introduces Jesus’
encounter with Nicodemus. The narrator finishes 2,25 with aujto;" ga;r ejgivnwsken
tiv h\n ejn tw/' ajnqrwvpw/ and opens the very next sentence with «Hn de; a[nqrwpo" ejk
twn Farisaivwn, Nikovdhmo" (3,1), thus showing that Nicodemus is an example of
'
a kind of believer whose signs-faith merits Jesus’ suspicion.
(80) J. FREY, Die johanneische Eschatologie (WUNT 117; Tübingen 2000) III,
244.
(81) KEENER (The Gospel of John, I, 533) finds that Jesus speaks in 3,5 about
“true purification†which “contrasts forcefully with mere Jewish water rituals
(3,25).†MOLONEY (The Gospel of John, 92) explains that in the rebirth ‘of water’
(3,5) the promises of John the Baptist, mentioned in 1,29-34, “are being realizedâ€.
(82) MOLONEY, The Gospel of John, 89.
(83) W. KLAIBER, “Der irdische und der himmlische Zeuge: Eine Auslegung
von Joh 3,22-36â€, NTS 36 (1990) 211. He continues to describe similarities in
the progression of the dialogue, even though he admits that the parallels are not
exact.