Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
“Dematerializing†Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm 543
example, make much of the comparison between Nicodemus as the
hesitant Jewish male religious leader and the responsive female
Samaritan and “moral outcast†(75). Yet the two accounts are not placed
back-to-back but are separated by John the Baptist’s witness in 3,22-36,
thus making an authorial contrast between Nicodemus and the
Samaritan at least less obvious. Even upon granting such an intended
comparison, a strict contrast between concentric and progressive ways
of reading narratives is unnecessary. Jesus’ dialogue with the Samaritan
woman is a good example for both reading strategies. A concentric
perception finds in 4,20-26 (key-term proskunevw) the story’s center of
theology while a sequential reading identifies a progressing Christology
from Jesus as ΔIoudai'o" in 4,9 to him as the swth;r tou' kovsmou in 4,42.
When taken together, 2,12-22 and 4,1-42 introduce the reader to
a temple Christology that negotiates the new faith in contrast with
material forms of Jewish and Gentile worship.
3. Salvation & Judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36)
a) The Parallel Make-up of 3,1-21 and 3,22-36
Jesus’ dialogue with Nicodemus and following monologue (3,1-
21) together with John the Baptist’s last witness in the Gospel (3,22-
36) stand at the center of the concentric design in John 2–4 and
“form a diptych†(76). The two stories are separated by a shift of place
from Jerusalem to Judea (3,22) and a shift of personal from Jesus and
Nicodemus to John the Baptist, his disciples and the Jews. Yet the
literary and theological unity of the chapter is evident from their
make-up marked by various parallels.
(a) Both episodes progress from a narrative exposition (2,23-25;
3,22-24) to a dialogue (3,1-12; 3,25-30) and finally to a monologue
(3,13-21; 3,31-36) (77), although scholars disagree on the exact point
of transition from dialogue to monologue in Jesus’ discourse with
Nicodemus (78):
(75) CARSON, The Gospel According to John, 216. KÖSTENBERGER, John, 112.
M.M. PAZDAN, “Nicodemus and the Samaritan Woman: Contrasting Models of
Discipleshipâ€, BTB 17 (1987) 145-148.
(76) MOLONEY, The Gospel of John, 89.
(77) So first Y. IBUKI, “Gedankenaufbau und Hintergrund des 3. Kapitels des
Johannesevangeliumsâ€, Bulletin of Seikie University 14 (1978) 9-33, esp. 11.
(78) Some propose that the monologue begins already in 3,11 (cf. DODD,
Interpretation, 301, 305); others in 3,13, e.g., U. SCHNELLE, Das Evangelium nach
Johannes (ThHK 4; Leipzig 1998) 73; others in 3,14, e.g., K. WENGST, Das