Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
“Dematerializing†Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm 533
a) The Beginning of the Narrative Unit: The Wedding in Cana
(a) The first miracle in Cana (2,1-12) is sometimes viewed as the
conclusion of the previous testimonies and callings of disciples
(1,19-51) (28). Jesus’ promise to Nathanael, that he would see “greater
things†(meivzw touvtwn, 1,50) is thus seen as fulfilled in the miracle at
the wedding. As a more “private miracleâ€, it confirms the disciples’
earlier responses of faith (1,38-39.45.50; 2,11) before the public
ministry begins with the temple cleansing (29). More specifically,
since Origen the reference to the “third day†in 2,1, when connected
with the “(next) day†mentioned in 1,29.35.43, is quite often
computed into a six-day week at least, if not even a seven-or eight-
day week:
SIX DAYS(30) SEVEN DAYS(31) EIGHT DAYS(32)
DAY
1 1,19-28
2 1,29-34 Same as befor Same as before
3 1,35-42
4 1,43-51 1,40-42 1,40-42
5 1,43-51 1,43-51
6 2,1-11
7 2,1-11
8 2,1-11
The seven- and eight-day schemes understand the expression th;n
hJmevran ejkeivnhn in 1,39 as a signal for the close of the third day
before the fourth day begins in 1,40. In addition, the seven-day
scheme counts the “third day†in 2,11 from day no. five, but
including it (33), while the eight-day scheme excludes it. The six-day
scheme followed by the Passover in 2,13 is then understood as an
(28) C.F. KEIL, Commentar über das Evangelium des Johannes (Leipzig 1881)
36; WESTCOTT, The Gospel, I, lxxxviii; F.F. BRUCE, The Gospel of John (Grand
Rapids, MI 1983) 24.
(29) BARRETT, The Gospel, 189.
(30) So J. FREY, Die johanneische Eschatologie (WUNT 116; Tübingen 1998)
II, 192-196 — where he refers also to Origen (Ioh., VI, 258-259), Bengel,
Luthardt, Barrett, Olsson.
(31) So already C.E. LUTHARDT, Das johanneische Evangelium nach seiner
Eigenthümlichkeit (Nürnberg 1852) 76-78; M.-E. BOISMARD, Du Baptême à Cana
(Jean, 1,19-2,11) (LD 18; Paris 1956); T. BARROSSE, “The Seven Days of the New
Creation in St. John’s Gospelâ€, CBQ 21 (1959) 507-516, and others.
(32) See B. LINDARS, The Gospel of John (NCB; London 1972) 128.
(33) BRUCE (The Gospel of John, 68) notes that “we should say ‘two days later’
(Moffatt)â€.