Lars Kierspel, «'Dematerializing' Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm», Vol. 89 (2008) 526-554
After offering a critical analysis of Moloney’s synthetical parallelism for John 2–4, this article argues for a chiastic structure of the Cana-to-Cana cycle which directs the reader from the visible signs (2,1-12+4,43-54) and physical properties of religion (2,13-22+4,1-42) to Jesus as the metaphysical agent of
God’s salvation and judgment (3,1-21+3,22-36). The new 'dematerialized' faith thereby subverts expectations of material restoration and reorients the believing eye not towards a sanctuary but towards the Son.
“Dematerializing†Religion: Reading John 2–4 as a Chiasm 551
operates without physical places and media of purification. In a
world where location and purification (see kaqarismov" in 2,6; 3,25)
define salvation for insiders and judgment for outsiders, the Fourth
Gospel radically redefines access to God. The author’s anti-docetic
Christology (e.g., 1,14; 11,35; 19,5) guards from overinterpreting his
theological efforts into an absolute mind-matter dualism (106). As
paradoxical as it sounds, the new religion centers on an emphatically
human God (1,18; 20,28). Yet it does operate without a temple and
its structured personnel, without a city, a tangible kingdom, a
calendar of feasts, jars, animals, birth certificates. Even possible
sacramental allusions in John 3 and 6 appear as barely visible tokens
of faith when compared with the impressive amount of religious
furniture in Judaism and paganism.
3. In the structural center of John 2–4 and at the heart of the
contrasts therein lies a difference in the kind of “seeing†required by
the old and the new religion. Verbs of “seeing†frame John 3, the
center of the narrative unit (3,3.35). In his first response to
Nicodemus Jesus speaks of seeing “the Kingdom of God†and thereby
picks up the traditional nutshell of expectations for God’s visible
reign (3,3.5). Yet the concept of God’s reign is filled with new
content. The visible nature of divine rule is reoriented towards having
“eternal life†now (3,15.16) and “seeing life†(3,36) through faith.
Key terms of any religion, that of God’s “loveâ€, of “saving†and
“judging†are not tied to Jerusalem, a temple, an ethnic group or a rite
of physical purification but to the Son as the one condition without
which life is unavailable. While the narratives negotiate this theme
with the situational and religious flavor of first century Palestine and
Judaism, the monologue in 3,13-21 transcends a Jewish/Samaritan
context and interprets the historical experience of Jesus’ ministry and
his rejection in theological terms (God, love, hate, world, light,
darkness). Since the miracles in John 2,1-12 and John 4,43-54 appeal
to the eye and potentially stimulate a form of “seeing†that falls short
of true faith (see 2,23; 4,48; 6,14-15; etc.) (107), the center of the
(106) As numerous recent studies have shown, the Fourth Gospel neither offers
a docetic Christology nor was it the preferred textbook of later Gnosticism. See
only S. VOORWINDE, Jesus’ Emotions in the Fourth Gospel. Human or Divine?
(LNTS 284; London 2005); C.E. HILL, The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church
(Oxford 2004).
(107) The critical notes on a kind of faith that is based on “seeing signs†(2,23;
4,48) indicate what is detailed in following chapters. Jesus’ miracles led to