Joel White, «Anti-Imperial Subtexts in Paul: An Attempt at Building a Firmer Foundation», Vol. 90 (2009) 305-333
This article argues that, though it cannot be doubted that there is a subversive quality to Paul’s letters, attempts to identify subversive subtexts have failed due to their preoccupation with what is deemed inherently subversive vocabulary. A better approach to grounding Paul’s anti-imperial theology is to recognize that he affirmed the subversive late Second temple Jewish-apocalyptic, and particularly Danielic, narrative that viewed Rome as final earthly kingdom that will be destroyed by the coming of God’s kingdom.
328 Joel White
alluding to a widespread apocalyptic tradition concerning the role of
the elect in the eschaton (69). This tradition has its roots in a
straightforward reading of Dan 7,22 that “[the Ancient of days] gave
judgment to the saints of the Most High†(th;n krivsin e[dwke toi'" aJgivoi"
tou' uJyivstou) (70). The breadth of attestation for this tradition in early
Jewish literature and the off-handed manner in which Paul refers to it
constitute strong evidence that this Danielic concept, and thus the
narrative of Dan 7, help shaped Paul’s Heilsgeschichte.
3. Paul’s Notion that the Present Age has Almost Run its Course
Several texts make it clear that Paul shared the belief of his Jewish
contemporaries that the heilsgeschichtliche period they were living in
was the penultimate one (i.e. Daniel’s fourth kingdom) and that it
would soon be followed by the consummation of God’s eternal reign.
We cannot examine each of these in depth, and since I have offered
similar analysis elsewhere (71) I will only briefly review the evidence
here.
a) 1 Cor 7,29-31
In the pericope preceding 1 Cor 7,29-31 Paul argues that there is no
cause for undue concern about one’s station in life, whether one is
married or unmarried, circumcised or uncircumcised, slave or free. In
(69) Cf. e.g. G.D. FEE, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (NICNT; Grand
Rapids, MI 1987) 233; W. SCHRAGE, Der erste Brief an die Korinther (1Kor 1,1-
6,11) (EKK VII/1; Neukirchen-Vluyn 1991) 410; E.J. SCHNABEL, Der erste Brief
an die Korinther (HTA; Wuppertal 2007) 307.
(70) Cf. C.H. DODD, According to the Scriptures. The Substructure of New
Testament Theology (London 1952) 68; B.S. ROSNER, Paul Scripture, and Ethics.
A Study of 1 Corinthians 5-7 (Grand Rapids, MI 1994) 111. The provenance of
the tradition concerning the judgment of angels in v. 3 (ajggevlou" krinou'men) is
less clear.
(71) WHITE, Erstlingsgabe, 143-156. There I argued that Paul’s attitude with
regard to the timing of the Parousia may be best described not as an “akute
Naherwartung†— so U. SCHNELLE, Paulus: Leben und Denken (Berlin 2003) 673
— but as a “kontingente Naherwartungâ€. By that I meant (and I do not intend to
argue otherwise here) that Paul did not believe that the Parousia must necessarily
occur “soon†(i.e. during his lifetime), although he certainly did not rule out that
possibility. Instead, he expected the Parousia to take place immediately after those
events that signaled the end of the present age. He clearly thought that these events
were “near†(i.e., they would occur next in God’s fore-ordained Heilsgeschichte)
and therefore that he was living in temporal proximity to the end of the present
age.