Callia Rulmu, «Between Ambition and Quietism: the Socio-political Background of 1 Thessalonians 4,9-12», Vol. 91 (2010) 393-417
Assuming the Christian group of Thessalonica to be a professional voluntary association of hand-workers (probably leatherworkers), this paper argues that 1 Thessalonians in general, and especially the injunction to «keep quiet» (4,11), indicates Paul’s apprehension regarding how Roman rulers, city dwellers, and Greek oligarchies would perceive an association converted to an exclusive cult and eager to actively participate in the redistribution of the city resources. Paul, concerned about a definite practical situation rather than a philosophically or even theologically determined attitude, delivered precise counsel to the Thessalonians to take a stance of political quietism as a survival strategy.
402 CALLIA RULMU
A rescript of Septimius Severus (emperor from 193 to 211 CE)
made clear that the law was valid also in the provinces 40.
The excursus above shows how Rome and Roman statesmen
were deeply concerned by the activities and proliferation of
collegia — a concern they surely exported to their jurisdictions. As
a matter of fact, Roman and Italian voluntary associations were not
the only ones to feel the need to dissipate any distrust and
suspiciousness by underscoring their legitimacy and allegiance.
Foreign and Greek speaking thiasoi showed the same effort. An
inscription found in Rome dedicated to a society of musicians does
not fail to mention that “the senate has given permission to hold
meetings, to be called to assembly, and to be mustered in
accordance with the Julian law by authority of Augustus for the
sake of the games†(ILS 4966, ln. 5-8) 41. The marble tablet found
in Lanuvium (Italy) dating from 136 CE quotes verbatim (ln. 11-13)
the decree of the Senate which allows voluntary association to
purportedly meet on a monthly basis with the (alleged) purpose of
providing funerals to its members, and then (ln. 15-18) profusely
incenses not only the emperor, but the whole imperial house 42.
The scarcity of documents, especially in the East, regarding the
enforcement of Roman decrees on collegia is striking, especially
when compared to the evident distrust and reiterated attempts to
exert a reassuring control over them. Since the laws were clear
e n o u g h , we can only imagine that voluntary associations
proliferated almost out of control. Many of them, though de iure
outlawed, were in practice tolerated with much suspicion. Two
elements may have assured the survival of non-official associations:
(i) promulgated laws seem to appear as answers to local problems
and definite situations, rather than widespread political concern;
an d (ii) the associations would seek protection by linking
themselves to local high status patrons. Nevertheless, wherever
Roman imperial administrators were present, guilds were looked
down upon, and were obliged to strive to show their allegiance to
the State and the Emperor. An important and visible way to prove
R.K. SHERK, The Roman Empire. Augustus to Hadrian (Translated
40
Documents from Greece and Rome 6; Cambridge – New York – New
Rochelle – Melbourne – Sydney 1988) 177.
Translated by SHERK, The Roman Empire, 177.
41
CIL XIV 2112.
42