Callia Rulmu, «Between Ambition and Quietism: the Socio-political Background of 1 Thessalonians 4,9-12», Vol. 91 (2010) 393-417
Assuming the Christian group of Thessalonica to be a professional voluntary association of hand-workers (probably leatherworkers), this paper argues that 1 Thessalonians in general, and especially the injunction to «keep quiet» (4,11), indicates Paul’s apprehension regarding how Roman rulers, city dwellers, and Greek oligarchies would perceive an association converted to an exclusive cult and eager to actively participate in the redistribution of the city resources. Paul, concerned about a definite practical situation rather than a philosophically or even theologically determined attitude, delivered precise counsel to the Thessalonians to take a stance of political quietism as a survival strategy.
404 CALLIA RULMU
Cicero (Leg. II.32-35) warned against the private cult of new or
strange divinities, evoking the ominous events of the bacchanalian
crisis. Dionysus of Halicarnassus also linked the importance and
necessity of a proper way to honor the gods with the virtues of
good citizens. According to him, Roman citizens (who allegedly
h a d some form of aversion towards foreign gods) had to
‘scrutinize’ the foreign ways of worship and only adopt the best
and decorous ones 45. Livy also insists upon the necessity of being
protected from foreign cults that could pollute the celebrated more
Romano (Hist. 39.16.8-9). The same fear is tangible in the account
made by Valerius Maximus (I.3.3) 46 of the ban of the Jews from
Rome (138 or 139 BCE) promulgated by Cornelius Hispanus, called
Hispalus by Valerius 47.
Not surprisingly, many stories circulated at the beginning of
the first century AD about how to worship the gods properly, about
the heroic deeds of people who sacrificed themselves to the gods
for the common good, and about the intimate relationship between
respect for the natural law, the prosperity of a the state, and the
commonwealth 48. Valerius exalts the amore patrie and the pietas
itorum 9; Goldbach 1994): “ . . . the emperors were divi – deified – rather than
dei . . . The emperors were honoured and celebrated, but they were not the
same as Zeus, Heracles, or Asclepius. Even though Greek is less able to
accommodate the distinction between divus and deus, Greek writers show un-
mistakably that they felt the difference†(328). Cf. p. 198-206 of the same
book, where she quotes, for instance, Aristides (Or. XIX), who reports that
Smyrna enjoyed its unparalleled prosperity kaì pròs theôn kaì pròs humôn
(“ thanks to the gods and to you [the emperors]â€) (199).
Dionysus of Halicarnassus, The Roman Antiquities (LOEB ; Cambridge
45
– London 1968) II.18.1-3. Cf. also II.19.1-5, where talking about the imported
cult of the goddess Cybelê in 205 BCE to Rome from Pessinus (Asia Minor),
Dionysus makes fun of the awkward way the Phrygians used to worship:
“ [they] carry her image in procession through the city ... [they] walk in proc-
ession in a party-coloured robe, begging alms and escorted by flute-players.
The Roman senate issued a decree according to which no native Roman could
follow such pompous display, because so cautious are they (the Romans)
about admitting any foreign religious customs and so great is their aversion to
all pompous display that is wanting in decorum†(II.19.5).
It is worth nothing that, in this section of his book, Valerius puts on the
46
same level the Jews and the Chaldaeans (astrologers).
Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Hispanus, praetor for foreigners in 138 (or
47
139) BCE.
E.g.,Valerius Maximus, V 6. Preface: “Piety (pietas) has done justice to
.
48