Callia Rulmu, «Between Ambition and Quietism: the Socio-political Background of 1 Thessalonians 4,9-12», Vol. 91 (2010) 393-417
Assuming the Christian group of Thessalonica to be a professional voluntary association of hand-workers (probably leatherworkers), this paper argues that 1 Thessalonians in general, and especially the injunction to «keep quiet» (4,11), indicates Paul’s apprehension regarding how Roman rulers, city dwellers, and Greek oligarchies would perceive an association converted to an exclusive cult and eager to actively participate in the redistribution of the city resources. Paul, concerned about a definite practical situation rather than a philosophically or even theologically determined attitude, delivered precise counsel to the Thessalonians to take a stance of political quietism as a survival strategy.
403
BETWEEN AMBITION QUIETISM
AND
their allegiance to the Empire was to actively participate in the Cult
of the Emperor.
3. Hostility Caused by the Adoption of an Exclusive Cult 43
The cult of foreign gods was perceived as a threat to the
natural order of things, and thus to the State itself 44. Already
Traditionally, New Testament scholars have manifested a certain interest
43
in exploring the Cult of the Roman Emperor in connection and in competition
with the political imagery laid out in the book of Revelation. However the im-
portance of the Imperial Cult as a pervasive and prominent reality in Greek
cities, Asia Minor and even Palestine has often been downplayed in discourses
about the historical Jesus and Paul of Tarsus, e.g. H. KOESTER, Introduction to
the New Testament (Philadelphia, PA 1982) I, 366-371. More recently, never-
theless, there has been a better assessment of the Imperial Cult in all its forms
(festivals, games, rituals, patronage system, etc) as the “web of power that
formed the fabric of societyâ€, so S.R.F. PRICE, Rituals and Powers. The Roman
Imperial Cult in Asia Minor (Cambridge 1985) 274. An increasing number of
scholars recognize the need of seriously read Jesus’ and Paul’s claims and mis-
sion against the backdrop of Roman imperial ideology: see for example
R.A. HORSLEY, Jesus and the Spiral of Violence. Popular Jewish Resistance in
Roman Palestine (San Francisco, CA 1987); J.D. CROSSAN, The Historical
Jesus. The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant (San Francisco, CA 1991);
D. GEORGI, Theocracy in Paul’s Praxis and Theology (Minneapolis, MN
1991) ; R.A. HORSLEY (ed.), Paul and Empire. Religion and Power in Roman
Imperial Society (Harrisburg, PA 1997). However, some scholars are still skep-
tical about the presence of a subversive, anti-Imperial language especially, but
not only, in Pauline writings, and therefore attach little importance (if any) to
the relevance of the Cult of the Emperor for early Christian studies. Cf. PRICE,
Rituals and Powers; P. ZANKER, The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus
(Ann Arbor, MI 1988); J. SCHEID, La religion des Romains (Paris 1998);
M. CLAUSS, Kaiser und Gott. Herrscherkult im römischen Reich (Stuttgart –
Leipzig 1999); J. SCHEID, Religion et piété à Rome (Sciences des religions;
Paris 2001); I. GRADEL, Emperor Worship and Roman Religion (Oxford Clas-
sical Monographs; Oxford 2002); D. FISHWICK, The Imperial Cult in the Latin
West. Studies in the Ruler Cult of the Western Provinces of the Roman Empire
(Leiden 2004) 4 vols.; J. SCHEID, Quand faire c’est croire. Les rites sacri-
ficiels des Romains (Collection historique; Paris 2007). Of special interest is
J. WHITE, “Anti-Imperial Subtexts in Paul: An Attempt at Building o Firmer
Foundation â€, Bib 90 (2009) 305-333, where the subversive anti-Imperial char-
acter of Pauline texts is maintained, but on the grounds of second Temple
Jewish-apocalyptic discourse.
G.W. BOWERSOCK, Studies on the Eastern Roman Empire. Social, Eco-
44
nomic and Administrative History Religion Historiography (Bibliotheca Erod-