Gesila Nneka Uzukwu, «Gal 3,28 and its Alleged Relationship to Rabbinic Writings», Vol. 91 (2010) 370-392
Scholars have suggested that Gal 3,28 is comparable to similar sayings found in rabbinic writings, and that the latter can help in interpreting and understanding the meaning and theology of Gal 3,28. In this study we have analysed and compared the alleged similar sayings found in Jewish texts and Gal 3,28 in order to demonstrate that Gal 3,28 is neither literally nor thematically related to the former, and we should not allow the alleged similar sayings found in rabbinic writings to influence our reading of Gal 3,28. Both texts reflect the conceptual uses of pairs of opposites in the Greco-Roman tradition, but at the same time, their subsequent usages or occurrences in Jewish and Christian texts came into being independently from one another.
390 GESILA NNEKA UZUKWU
suggest that Paul’s uses of the expressions in Gal 3,28 is
influenced by how the pairs are used in Judaism and among Jewish
Christians, both of which sought to emphasise the differences
between Jew and Greek, slave and free, and between male and
female on the basis of the Law.
P. Tomson’s suggestion that in Gal 3,28 Paul is influenced by
his Halakhic background, could shed light on the question of the
relationship between Gal 3,28 and the three blessings of gratitude
found in rabbinic sources 36. In his Paul and the Jewish Law:
Halakha in the Letters of the Apostle to the Gentiles, Tomson
emphasises that Paul’s understanding of halakha influenced his
position on how the Jews are distinct from the Gentiles 37.
According to Tomson, Paul accepted distinctions in the social
reality between Jews and Gentiles (non-Jews), but in the context of
his gospel to the Gentiles, “the phrase that ‘in Christ is neither Jew
n o r Greek†would mean that such differences as he does
recognizes between Jew and non-Jews are not soteriologically
relevant, for, as his other phrase goes, neither Jew nor Greek are
‘justified (or saved) by works of the Law†38.
For our present discussion, Tomson’s approach to Gal 3,28 offers
some interesting clues and raises some questions. Given his argument
on how Gal 3,28 is influenced by Paul’s Jewish origin, one may wish,
for example, to investigate the issue of the relationship between
Galatians is an occasional letter. It was written in response to the question of
whether and how Gentiles can obtain equal participation in the promise,
blessings and heirship of Abraham. The Judaizers have arrived in Galatians and
preached the gospel that Gentile converts to Christianity should conform to the
normal procedure prescribed for proselytes — circumcision and commitment to
Israel’s Torah in order to obtain full membership in the heirship of Abraham.
Against this teaching, Paul argues that in Christ there is no distinction between
Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female, all believers are heirs of
Abraham, members of God’s people and recipients of his promises. See
J.M.G. BARCLAY, Obeying the Truth. A Study of Paul’s Ethics in Galatians (ed.
J. RICHES) (SNTW; Edinburgh 1988) 54-55.
P. TOMSON, Paul and the Jewish Law. Halakha in the Letters of the
36
Apostle to the Gentiles (Assen 1990). See also his recent article: P.J. TOMSON,
“ Halakah in the New Testament: A Research Overviewâ€, The New Testament
and Rabbinic Literature (eds. R. BIERINGER – F. GARCÃA MARTÃNEZ –
D. POLLEFEYT – P. TOMSON) (JSJSup; Leiden 2010) 135-206.
TOMSON, “Halakahâ€, 141-142.
37
TOMSON, “Halakahâ€, 168.
38