Jerry A. Gladson, «Postmodernism and the Deus absconditus in Lamentations 3», Vol. 91 (2010) 321-334
Lamentations reflects the silence of God. God seemingly does not act or speak. To some, this detachment represents an absence of God; to others, a «hiddenness» of God (Deus absconditus). Analysis of Lam 3,55-57, the crux interpretum for the divine silence, suggests the q strophe may break this oppressive silence. The strophe reflects an awareness of God who speaks. God stands in the background of the whole of life for this poet, emerging only fleetingly and in ways oblique. This perspective is similar to the ambiguous, indeterminate approach to reality in postmodernism. The divine Voice thus joins other voices in Lamentations.
330 JERRY A. GLADSON
intends to break the divine silence and bring hope to the
beleaguered poets of Lamentations?
In most cases in the HB where the expression, arytAla, is found,
it has a contemporaneous reference 40. Here, its only occurrence in
Lamentations, it is unfortunately impossible to tell with any degree
of certainty whether it references past, present, or future. Given the
context of the poem, despite the considerations noted above, more
likely it refers to some previous experience attributed to God,
answered by an assuring oracle 41. The temporal clause, “in the day
when I called on youâ€, arqa μ/yb, (3,57), suggests a past
experience.
Even though probably recalling an earlier incident, the poet
intends its recital, not as satirical, but as an expression of what he
believes YHWH has done, is doing, or will do for the struggling
Judahites. He intends this recital to crack open the door for YHWH’s
current or future intervention. It stands as a metaphor for the
anticipated divine action. Thus he cites a word of YHWH: “Do not
fear †! To the other voicings in Lamentations, in other words, the
poet now adds the Voice of God. The silence of God is broken,
whether in present reality or anticipation, in this plea for
deliverance 42. In this imperative, the Deus absconditus now
becomes the Deus revelatus.
Interestingly, Lamentations shares this reticence to give voice to
YHWH with the other Khamesh Megilloth of which it is a part.
While in part this may be due to prevailing, post-exilic Zeitgeist in
which these books reached their final form, when there was in
Second Temple Judaism an ever-increasing reluctance to speak
See Gen 15,1. 24; 46,3; Num 21,34; Deut 1,21; Josh 8,1; 10,8; 11,6; Judg
40
4,18 ; 6,23; 1 Sam 22,23; 23,17; 2 Sam 9,7; 2 Kgs 1,15; 6,16; 19,6; 1 Chr
22,13 ; 28,30; Isa 7,4; 10,24; 41,10.13; 43,1.5; 44,2; Jer 1,8; 30,10; 46,27-28;
Ezek 2,6; Dan 10,12.19. Three occurrences are of uncertain temporal
reference : Job 5,22; Ps 49,16; Prov 3,25. This expression appears 40 times in
the HB, but significantly only here in Lamentations.
So MARTYR, Lamentations, 147. Determination of the temporal aspect
41
h e r e is of little consequence, according to O’CONNOR, “ B o o k of
Lamentations â€, 1056, and what matters is that “it functions in the poem as a
cause for present expectancy, a budding hope that God has already begun to
act â€. Cf. Ps 31,21-22.
Cf. “He fulfills the desire of all who fear him, / he also hears their cry,
42
and saves them†(Ps 145,18).