Samantha Joo, ««Trembled Like Him»: Reassessment of 1 Sam 13,7b», Vol. 91 (2010) 433-440
Commentaries and translations have traditionally translated the preposition, rx), in 1 Sam 13,7b (wyrx) wdrx M(h) as either modifying the subject or indicating the «back» of Saul. However, the preposition is better explained as «following and imitating» so that the army trembled like Saul. Since Saul was afraid of the Philistines, his fear infects the army, which scatters from him. Therefore, Saul, according to the Davidic court historian, is an ineffective military leader.
“ Trembled Like Himâ€: Reassessment of 1 Sam 13,7b *
The Hebrew phrase, wyrja wdrj μ[hAlbw (“ and all the people followed him
trembling â€, NRSV), in 1 Sam 13,7b is problematic because of the
awkward use of the preposition, rja (“ behind â€), with the verb, drj (“ to
tremble â€). However, a careful analysis of the preposition may perhaps
point to a more nuanced reading which may reveal the Davidic historian’s
agenda to undermine Saul’s aptitude as a military leader. According to the
historian, Saul begins to show signs of fear in the face of formidable
challenge, the imposing Philistine army, which then infects his army.
Therefore, he is unqualified to rule Israel unlike David, the king apparent.
Before examining the phrase, its larger context needs to be discussed.
The story of the Philistine war at the Michmash pass (13,2–14,46) forms
the backdrop for the meeting between Saul and Samuel in Gilgal
(13,7b-15a). On account of the intrusive nature of the meeting and its anti-
Saulide attitude, most scholars have considered 13,7b-15a to be
secondary, the work of the Davidic historian 1. While preparing for battle
against the Philistines, the Israelites are mustered at Gilgal (v. 4). The
author does not mention whether Saul himself went to Gilgal to gather the
troops but he is found there in v. 7b 2. Here, in the midst of a battle, Saul
waits for Samuel for seven days as the prophet had supposedly
c o m m a n d e d him back in 1 S a m 10,8. As the storyline clearly
demonstrates, more than seven days transpire between Saul’s anointment
* This work was supported by a research grant from Seoul Women’s
University (2010).
See J. WELLHAUSEN, Prolegomena to the History of Israel (Edinburgh
1
1885) 256-262, and M. WHITE, “Saul and Jonathan in 1 Samuel 1 and 14â€,
Saul in Story and Tradition (ed. C.S. EHRLICH) (FAT 47; Tübingen 2006) 119-
138. Contrary to P. LONG, The Reign and Rejection of King Saul. A Case for
Literary and Theological Coherence (SBLDS 118; Atlanta, GA 1989) 51-66,
and D. VIKANDER EDELMAN, King Saul in the Historiography of Judah
(JSOT 121; Sheffield 1991) 76-82.
If we follow the Greek, then v. 7a continues in v. 15ba. According to the
2
Greek, v. 15ba reads, “the remnant of the army went up after Saul to meet the
fighting force, going from Gilgal toward Gibeah of Benjaminâ€. See P. KYLE
MCCARTER, I Samuel. A New Translation with Introduction, Notes &
Commentary (AB 8; Garden City, NY 1980) 227, who thinks that the MT has
a “long haplographyâ€. Saul never goes to Gilgal; instead the army joins Saul
at Gibeah, where he and his son are preparing to fight the Philistines.