Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
225
ON JESUS’ LAST WEEK(S)
Matt 26 Mark 14 Luke 22 1 Cor 11
(23) The Lord Jesus,
(Passover meal) t h e night he was
handed over,
( 2 6 ) Now, while 22) And while they ( 1 9 ) And taking t o o k bread, (24)
t h e y were eating, were eating, taking b r e a d , h e g a v e and, giving thanks
Jesus, taking bread bread, blessing, he thanks, he broke (it) broke (it)
and blessing broke broke (it) and gave a n d gave (it) to
(it) and giving (it) ( i t ) to them and them, saying: and said:
t o his disciples, said : Take, this is This is my body, gi- T h i s is my body,
said : Take, eat this my body. ven for you. Do this for you. Do this in
is my body in memory of me. memory of me. (25)
A n d likewise the
(27) And taking a (23) And taking a (20) And the cup cup after the meal,
cup cup, l i ke w i s e after the
meal,
and giving thanks g i v i n g thanks he
he gave (it) to them, gave (it) to them, [Ommited by WT]
saying : and they all drank
Drink of it all, it. (24) And he
saying : saying :
(28) For this is my s a i d : This is my
T h i s cup (is) the This cup is the new
Covenant blood, Covenant blood
n e w Covenant i n C o v e n a n t i n my
my blood, blood.
which is shed for which is shed for which is shed for
many, in remission many. you.
of sins.
This, do it, each time that you drink, in memory of me. (26) For, each time that you
eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.
Table 3. — The Eucharistic Institution.
Note on Table 3.
A feature common to all three Synoptics is the liturgical conciseness of
the passage. Contrary to the context, there is no dialogue and the dis-
ciples do not react, in spite of the strangeness of Jesus’ saying, whereas
in John 6,60-61 his followers are scandalized by similar words. The
forms given in Matt and Mark may reflect a tradition parallel to 1 Cor,
but the common reference to the Covenant underlines the fulfillment of
Scripture, be it the “new Covenant†of Jer 31,31 (Luke and 1 Cor) or the
“ blood of the Covenant†linked to the Sinai revelation according to
Exod 24,8 (Matt and Mark; see Heb 9,20). The latter have an intro-
duction “and as they were eatingâ€, which repeats the introduction to the
previous dialogue (Matt 26,23 and Mark 14,18), and establishes the con-
text as a meal.