Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
215
ON JESUS’ LAST WEEK(S)
The source of this story may have been an account of the eye-
witnesses mentioned in Luke 1,1. Some details find echoes in the
Synoptics (mainly Matt), and many more in John, but the passage can
hardly be a Christian interpolation, for at least two reasons: firstly,
there is no connection between the wonderworker and the wild man
(John the Baptist), whose deeds are reported one generation before,
under Archelaus; secondly, it attributes to Jesus neither any title, nor
any fulfillment of Scripture. He is unnamed, most probably out of
magic fear, for the Slavonic later adds an account on his Jewish dis-
ciples (after War 2 :221), who perform healings and say that their
master is still alive; in other words, his name had a certain power.
For the purposes of the present study, we see two stages in the
trial of Jesus before Pilate according to this version: the first one
results from a plot between the leaders and the high priest, out of fear
of Roman repression, and is akin to the suggestion of Caiaphas in
John 11,50; then Jesus is unexpectedly released. This corresponds to
Judas’ “betrayal†(delivery), followed by a trial in Pilate’s praeto-
rium (John 18,28-19,1), which ends with a scourging.
The second phase or second trial finishes with the crucifixion, as
if it were a Roman sentence — a detail stressed in John 18,31-32
without any mention of bribery. For Josephus, the two stages are
separated by several days. For John, they follow one another in dif-
ferent places on the same day, an unlikely proceeding.
This twofold trial offers a possible solution for Paul’s “the Lord
Jesus, on the night when he was handed over, took bread†(1 Cor
11,23). The institution would have taken place on a Saturday evening,
after Caiaphas’ denunciation and before Jesus’ arrest by night, but
this was “not during the feastâ€, in order to avoid dangerous disturb-
ances 20. However, the scheme was spoiled, because Pilate released
him the following day (Sunday).
Combining this starting point with a “solar Passover†on Wednes-
day and the crucifixion on Friday, it is possible to build a tentative
outline of Jesus’ last week:
— Saturday evening: possibly at Bethany after the anointing, the
rite of bread and wine, with similarities to the Eucharistic rite.
Judas is provoked.
See W. KLASSEN, Judas : Betrayer or Friend of Jesus? (Minneapolis,
20
MN 1996).