Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
205
ON JESUS’ LAST WEEK(S)
is the fine flour offering brought along by a leper after his
cleansing (Lev 14,10). This analogy is all the more striking because
he had just stated that the Passover sacrifice was Christ, adding the
following quote from Isaiah: “Like a lamb he was led to the
slaughter †(Isa 53,7). So, in spite of a context of Passover interpre-
tation, he ignores the unleavened bread, thus proving that he did
not attach any Eucharistic significance to it. In the IVth century,
bishop Ambrose of Milan (De sacramentis, IV:4) refers to normal
bread for the Eucharist (panis usitatus). Unleavened bread was
introduced later, but only in the Western Church and mainly for
practical reasons: it is whiter, purer, and easier to store. It was first
mentioned by Alcuin of York (ca. 740-804), during the age of the
Carolingian empire. Later, this led to the worship of the Holy Sac-
rament. The introduction of unleavened bread in the Eucharist was
supported by the text of 1 Cor 5,7, where Paul holds the traditional
Jewish view that leaven is a symbol of evil. Such a custom was
never accepted in the Eastern Churches, for the azymo (unleav-
¶
ened) bread was deemed to be an insult, making Christ acyxo ¶
“ without a soulâ€. Only when this became a serious issue between
the Churches was the Passover context of the Last Supper noticed
and used as an argument in favor of unleavened bread. It was
eventually one of the causes of the East-West Schism in 1054, after
which the use of unleavened bread became general in Latin Chris-
tendom 2.
At this point, a methodological rule should be stated. Given the
importance of such a ritual detail, one cannot imagine that the Eu-
charistic use of unleavened bread could have disappeared without
any discussion, if it was an element of the original Eucharist. An
addition can therefore be made to A. Jaubert’s historical hypo-
thesis on Jesus’ last Passover: it is necessary to separate the institu-
tion of the Eucharist from the days of Unleavened Bread, which
include Passover. So the last Supper of the Synoptics should be
See J.A. JUNGMANN, Missarum solemnia. The Mass of the Roman Rite.
2
Its Origins and Development (Westminster 1986) II, 305-306. The Armenians,
too, have used unleavened bread since ancient times, but this Church may have
been close to the Quartodecimans from its very origin, see S. SZYSZMAN, “Une
Pâque chrétienne célébrée le mercredi au XIIIe siècle ? â€, Tradition of the Text.
Studies Offered to Dominique Barthélemy in Celebration of his 70th Birthday
(eds. G.J. NORTON – S. PISANO) (OBO 109; Göttingen 1991) 309-310.