Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
210 ÉTIENNE NODET
isted previously and that Jesus’ innovation was to utter a new
meaning. Taking all this into account leads us to the conclusion
that the institution was introduced into the Last Supper from else-
where. Some tiny traces of such a rite can be found: at the end of
the Sabbath, after sunset, the traditional (Rabbinic) Jewish rite
includes the lighting of a torch and a blessing calling for “much
bread and new wine†(çwrytw –gd). By the Essenes, the Pentecostal
rite with the first-fruits (a small quantity) of bread and wine can be
observed at every meal where there are ten present (1QS 6:4-5) 11.
So at least two of the discrepancies mentioned above do not
pose any more problems: firstly, in the Last Supper, the institution
(bread and wine) has no material link with the signs of Passover
(lamb, bitter herbs and unleavened bread). Secondly, the difference
between the Biblical “third day†or “three days†and the Gospel
chronology of Jesus’ death and resurrection can be put into per-
spective : Jesus was crucified on a Friday, and the memorial rite of
his return to life is carried out every Sunday morning around
daybreak or sunrise. It is the performance of this rite that prompted
the location of the resurrection stories around that time, and not
the other way round, by some reworking of traditional reports,
most probably from various eyewitnesses. It has indeed been rec-
ognized that the resurrection stories are independent of the passion
narratives. In fact, this is implied by Paul’s saying: “For as often
as you eat this bread and drink the chalice you proclaim the Lord’s
death until he comes†(1 Cor 11,26). Performing the rite is a proc-
lamation that he is living.
The Gospels give several accounts of the apparitions of the
Risen One, many of which offer some calendrical clues. In John
20,1-29, the sequence of events includes: “on the first day of the
week â€, the visit of Mary Magdalene, then of Peter and the “be-
loved disciple†(v. 1-10); an apparition to Mary and her report to
the disciples (v. 11-18); then, an apparition to the disciples
that Mark’s account is the most authentic and concludes that the rendezvous
with the apostles is purely eschatological; similarly to the commentary on 1 Cor
11,26.
At the three Sabbath meals, the Jewish custom is still to say a kidush over
11
a cup of wine, along with the breaking of bread (b.Ber 47a and b.Shab 117b).