Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
218 ÉTIENNE NODET
same time as Apollinarius, and we can speculate that Melito may
have stressed the exclusive importance of the lunar calendar of the
Temple, with Passover on the following day. In any case, it is remark-
able that the problems caused by the Synoptic chronology appeared
at such a late stage.
Some years previously, ca. 150 CE, we have Justin Martyr’s testi-
mony. He explains to Trypho (Dialogue 111:3) : “On that day of
Passover you seized him, and also in the Passover you crucified him.â€
This phrasing hides the contradiction, for it combines both calendars
by playing on “Passoverâ€, the feast and the lamb: the first part recalls
the Synoptics, but the second part links the crucifixion with the
slaughtering of the lambs, before the feast itself. We saw above that
he insists on the symbolism of the Paschal lamb, but with a peculiar
chronology : the slaughtering of the lamb is done in the middle of the
Passover day. This is impossible, but Justin, who hardly lets Trypho
expound his own views, is not interested in Jewish rituals. He focuses
on the fulfilment of Scripture. For him, Jesus’ Passover culminates
with the cross. Elsewhere, Justin describes the Eucharist according to
the tradition (Apology I :66) : “For the apostles, in the Memoirs com-
posed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us
what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread and, when He
had given thanks, said, ‘Do this in remembrance of me, this is my
body’ etcâ€. Despite a reference to the Gospels 22, the instruction to
repeat the rite comes without any allusion to the Passover, since for
him the rite is to be performed weekly, but not anymore within an
agape meal 23. These two aspects are close to Paul’s formulation more
than to that of the Synoptics’.
Let us examine another aspect related to the evolution of the ca-
nonical Gospels in the IInd century 24. For a long time, it has been ob-
served that the Gospels contain very few allusions to the war of 70 CE.
According to a classical view, this is because they had been com-
Justin may have used a Gospel harmony, combining early stages of the
22
Gospels, see M.-É. BOISMARD – A. LAMOUILLE, Le Diatessaron. De Tatien Ã
Justin (Paris 1992); D. BARTHÉLEMY, “Justin et le texte de la Bibleâ€, Justin
Martyr. Ouvres complètes (Paris 1994) 368-375.
See G. DIX, The Shape of the Liturgy (London 1945) 98-102.
23
See E. NORELLI, “Papias de Hiérapolis a-t-il utilisé un recueil canonique
24
des quatre évangiles?â€, Le canon du Nouveau Testament. Regards nouveaux
sur l’histoire de sa formation (eds. G. ARAGIONE et al.) (Genève 2005) 35-56.