Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
226 ÉTIENNE NODET
ignores any link with the Eucharist; such was also the case in the
Memoirs of the Apostles he quoted from. The second step was the
introduction of the institution account into each Gospel. Table 3
shows the similarities and differences between these accounts.
But again, such a degree of manipulation may seem arbitrary.
A rationale is missing.
The Lukan version is close to 1 Cor, especially in the textus
receptus, while the omission of the WT is in keeping with the
broad context of Luke-Acts, where only the breaking of the bread
is mentioned. As for choosing which text is earlier, there is one
argument favoring the WT: the instruction to repeat the rite is mis-
sing in Matt, Mark and Luke WT, which makes sense, for the
Easter context is not to be repeated. The instruction is given in 1
Cor, which poses no problem, for there is no Passover context. In
the usual version of Luke, the instruction would imply the use of
unleavened bread, as at Passover 35.
2. Joshua’s Gilgal Passover and the Last Supper
An external observation suggests a correspondence between the
Passover of entry into the Promised Land, celebrated at Gilgal by
Joshua and the twelve tribes, and the Last Supper of the Synoptics,
which combines two basic elements, a Passover meal and a rite of
bread and wine.
A similar observation can be made in the fourth Gospel.
According to John 6,4 “Passover, the feast of the Jews, was at
hand â€, and in the story of the multiplication of the loaves which
follow, two details differ from the Synoptic version: there is no
“ breaking of the breadâ€, and the lad brings along five barley
loaves (John 6,9). Lev 23,10 states that among the rites to be per-
formed for Passover is the waving of a barley sheaf as a first-fruit
offering. In the context of John 6,9, the loaves of the lad are a
kind of first-fruits, from which the whole multitude will be fed.
Later, in his speech, Jesus draws a contrast between the manna in
the wilderness, which led to death (v. 49), and “eating his flesh
and drinking his bloodâ€, which gives eternal life, i.e. entry into
See N. WILKINSON DURAN, The Power of Disorder. Ritual Elements in
35
Mark’s Passion Narrative (JSNTSup 378; London 2008) 55-76.