Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
208 ÉTIENNE NODET
other passages, the “third day†is related to the termination of var-
ious kinds of difficulties and trials. It is clearly a Biblical expres-
sion 6. Incidentally, the theme of Isaac as a figure of Christ is not
prominent in the NT (only Gal 3,16), even though another midrash
interprets a tiny difficulty in the MT by saying that Isaac’s sacri-
fice was a true one, for Abraham’s knife touched his neck and
resulted in the loss of a drop of blood (Yalkut Shim’oni, I :101).
Now, it is useful to draw a distinction between the Biblical
meanings of the “three days†or the “third dayâ€, which are not
linked to any calendar, and some other items that are. Besides the
Friday of the crucifixion, we have a remarkable event in Acts
20,7-12 : the night-long vigil at Troas, with the breaking of the
bread on the first day of the week and the healing of young Eu-
tychus (“the lucky oneâ€). The calendar used is lunar, since this day
begins on Saturday evening — unlike the Creation week. The event
takes place sometime after the days of Unleavened Bread and Paul
has been in Troas for several days (v. 6). So he is not in a hurry,
and the breaking of the bread is unrelated to Passover. In fact, the
main point of the story is the resurrection — or healing — of Eu-
tychus (“Luckyâ€), the rite within a vigil being only circumstantial.
So it was just a customary, weekly feature (see v. 1).
An unexpected detail is given: in the Troas house, there were
many lamps (lampadev v. 8), which recalls a well-known Jewish
Â¥
custom. Latin satirists (Seneca, Persius Flaccus) railed against the
Jews for their idleness and their smoking lamps on the Sabbath 7.
They cannot have meant the lighting of lamps on Friday evening,
since the Romans counted the day from midnight, and in any case,
the Jews could only light lamps before the Sabbath began (see
Exod 35,3; m.Shab 2 :7) and were not able to trim them later 8. A
R.D. AUS, The Death, Burial and Resurrection of Jesus, and the Death,
6
Burial and Translation of Moses in Judaic Tradition (New York 2008) 230-252,
adds a series of Jewish sources mentioning a “third dayâ€.
See M. STERN, Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism (Jerusalem
7
1974-1984) I, 432-437, with references and discussions, and II:110 for the con-
fusion of Sabbath and Atonement Day.
The Jewish custom of lighting lamps on Friday evening (before sunset)
8
contains two major anomalies: firstly, it is a duty (hbwj), not a precept (hw[m),
and it lacks an associated blessing (b.Shab 23b) ; secondly, it is carried out by a
woman, contrary to the usual principle that women are dispensed from ob-
ligations linked to a fixed time (m.Shab 2 :6).