Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus’ Last Week(s)», Vol. 92 (2011) 204-230
Five conclusions allow us to explain Jesus last days and to assess the significance of the actual Gospel narratives. Firstly, his last Passover meal (Synoptics, solar calendar) took place on one Tuesday evening; secondly, the origin of the Eucharistic rite on the Lord’s day has nothing to do with Passover; thirdly, a feast of Passover-Easter (Pa/sxa) on a specific Sunday emerged somewhat late in the IInd century; fourthly, before this date, the Synoptics did not have their final shape; fifthly Josephus provides us with a clue to understand Jesus’ double trial before Pilate in the Passion narrative of John.
207
ON JESUS’ LAST WEEK(S)
night begins when Judas goes out during the Last Supper; the three
hours of darkness by the time of Jesus’ death are the second night;
the third is the Sabbath night. And after each night, there is a “dayâ€:
Friday morning, Friday afternoon, and Saturday; for him, Sunday
begins on Saturday evening, as in Acts 20,7, but he does not
mention any Lord’s day liturgy. He further explains that Jesus ate
the Passover “on the night of the 14th †for the Passover of the Jews
falls on the 14th “ night and dayâ€. So he understands that the
14th began on Thursday evening. This is a distortion of the Jewish
calendar, but it matches the Johannine chronology. However, he
says in the following section (§ 8) that the great day of the Passion
is “Friday 15th, night and dayâ€. This is in accordance with the Syn-
optic chronology, but the contradiction is blatant. Maybe “Friday†is
simply a mistake for “Saturdayâ€, for elsewhere he stresses the
significance of Jesus’ visit to Death (Demonstration on Death, § 4).
Interestingly enough, he compares the significance of the days of
Unleavened Bread for the Jews and for the Christians, indicating
that the latter kept the rite, but he does not make any connection be-
tween this and the custom of the Eucharist. To sum up, Aphrahat’s
explanation underlines the problem instead of solving it.
So the tension between the Biblical three days and the Gospel
narratives remains. As for the Jonah reference, it appears to be a
broad allusion to the aim of his mission in the conversion of the
people of Nineveh. Another passage maybe helpful, although it is
not quoted in the NT 4. In Hos 6,1-2, we read: “[God] has stricken,
he will bind us up. After two days he will revive us, on the third
day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.†A midrash
uses it to give some perspective to a particular detail in the account
of Abraham: “On the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes and saw
the place afar off†(Gen 22,4). It is explained that, at that moment,
Abraham was given a glimpse of salvation, after the anxiety of
traveling with his condemned son (Gen Rabba 56 :1) 5. This is con-
sistent with the next verse, in which Abraham indirectly tells his
servants that Isaac is not to die: “Stay here [...] I and the lad will
go [...] and we will come back to youâ€(Gen 22,5). In a number of
The first Christian writer to adduce it as a proof text for “the third dayâ€
4
was TERTULLIAN, Praescriptiones contra hereticis, § 43.
See M. REMAUD, Évangile et tradition rabbinique (Bruxelles 2003)
5
125-130.