Simon J. Joseph, ««Seek His Kingdom»: Q 12,22b-31, God’s Providence, and Adamic Wisdom.», Vol. 92 (2011) 392-410
In Q 12,22b-31, a kingdom-saying functions as the climax to a sapiential collection, but it is not self-evident that this message is sapiential. Q 12,31 uses traditional wisdom structures and forms to advance what appears to be an «eschatological» message. In this study, I re-examine the nature of the wisdom in Q 12,22b-31 and argue that the theme of God’s providence can be understood in relation to eschatological ideals of the restoration of creation and a «Son of God»/Adamic christology.
Biblica_1:Layout 1 21-11-2011 12:59 Pagina 400
400 SIMON J. JOSEPH
“secondary insertion†32. Many scholars also agree that Matthew has
added Ï€Ïῶτον in order to give priority to the “seeking†of the king-
dom 33. Seeking the kingdom comes first, although Matthew has “soft-
ened†the blow of this radical saying by allowing for secondary
concern over food and clothing despite the fact that “the underlying
tradition said precisely the opposite†34. “Seeking†(ζητÎω) is an active
pursuit, a striving after something desired 35. In sapiential literature,
“seeking†for Wisdom is a common motif (Prov 2,4, 14,6, 15,14,
18,15; Qoh 7,25; Wis 6,12; Sir 4,11-12, 6,27, 51,13). Yet Wisdom is
not mentioned in this passage. It is not “wisdom†that one is to seek,
but the “kingdom.†One is “to give oneself unreservedly to the pursuit
of the Kingdom†36.
Robinson and Heil have suggested that scholars supporting the
authenticity of Q 12:31 may be biased by the “theological presup-
position†of Jesus’ allegedly eschatological orientation†37. Robin-
son criticizes those who “automatically†take the kingdom to be “a
future reference by Jesusâ€, but whether Q 12,31 is “futuristic†or not
depends quite a bit on what one means by “eschatology†and “king-
domâ€. Robinson argues that the “original†collection asserted that
God’s constant care did not require the “nearness or the inbreaking
of the kingdom… Apparently it is not necessary also to refer to the
βασιλεία as an explanation for God’s constant care†38. Robinson,
however, is hardly free of his own theological interests, which in-
32
J.A. FITZMYER, The Gospel According to Luke X-XXIV. Introduction,
Translation and Notes (AB 28A; Garden City, NY 1985) 976; R.C.
TANNEHILL, The Sword of his Mouth. Forceful and Imaginative Language in
Synoptic Sayings (SBL SS 1; Philadelphia, PA 1975) 60-61.
33
R. GUNDRY, Matthew, 118; G. STRECKER, The Sermon on the Mount. An
Exegetical Commentary (Nashville, TN 1988) 140; HENDRICKX, The Sermon
on the Mount, 146; CATCHPOLE, Quest for Q, 37.
34
CATCHPOLE, Quest for Q, 37; G. AGRELL, Work, Toil and Sustenance. An
Examination of the View of Work in the New Testament, Taking into
Consideration Views found in the Old Testament, Intertestamental, and Early
Rabbinic Writings (Lund 1976) 73.
35
H. GREEVEN, “ζητÎω,†TDNT II, 893 n.5. See 1 Cor 4,2; Matt 28,5;
John 8,50; Matt 26,59; Phil 2,21.
36
GUELICH, The Sermon, 344. PIPER, Wisdom in the Q Tradition, 31.
37
ROBINSON, “The Pre-Q Textâ€, 177.
38
R.A. PIPER, “Wealth, Poverty, and Substinence in Qâ€, From Quest to
Q. Festschrift James M. Robinson (ed. J.M.A. ASGEIRSSON et al.) (BETL
146; Leuven 2000) 219-264, 247.