Matthew Thiessen, «Abolishers of the Law in Early Judaism and Matthew 5,17-20», Vol. 93 (2012) 543-556
Three times within Matt 5,17-20 passage Matthew uses the verb (kata)lu/w, signaling its importance. Consequently, I will focus on two historical events around which these words cluster: the Antiochan persecution and the destruction of the Temple. Since Jewish literature characterizes the Hellenizers of the Maccabean period as law abolishers, labeling a group as such implicated it in endangering the nation. As Josephus’ Jewish War demonstrates, after the Jewish Revolt, law abolishers were blamed for the Temple’s destruction. Thus, Matthew addresses the charge that Jesus abolished the law and, in so doing, brought about the destruction of the Temple.
04_Biblica_1_C_Thiessen_Layout 1 30/01/13 13:16 Pagina 546
546 MATTHEW THIESSEN
gues 10. Nonetheless, the increased frequency of katalu/w in 4 Mac-
cabees demonstrates that the author is not merely passively preserv-
ing this link between the word and the Antiochan persecution,
already established by 2 Maccabees, but is further emphasizing this
connection. Antiochus abolishes (katalu&w) the Jewish high priest
Onias, and unlawfully makes Onias’s brother Jason high priest
(4,15-16). In a manner befitting his law-abolishing appointment to
the high priesthood, Jason repays Antiochus for the office by chang-
ing the nation’s way of life and government including the building
of a gymnasium to replace the abolished Temple service (a)lla_ kai\
katalusai th_n tou~ i9erou~ khdemoni/an, 4,20). 4 Maccabees 4,21,
~
following 2 Maccabees, links this abolishing of the law to the Anti-
ochan persecution. Jason’s unlawful actions anger divine justice and
lead to the Antiochan persecution. According to 4 Macc 4,24, Anti-
ochus is not able to abolish (katalu=sai) the observance of the law
because many Jews abolished (kataluome/naj) his decrees and pun-
ishments. One example of such abolishment of Antiochus’s decrees
occurs in 4 Maccabees 5, when Antiochus tries to force a priest named
Eleazer to eat pork. The old priest’s response to Antiochus is as fol-
lows: “Do not think that it would be a small sin to eat unclean food,
for to transgress the law in small or larger matters is of equal serious-
ness, for in each the law is disdained†(5,19-21). Eleazar argues that
the eating of unclean meat, even under compulsion of death, is an
abolishment of the ancestral law (to_n pa&trion katalu~sai no&mon,
5,33). The author states that reason guided Eleazar despite torture and
the maddening waves of emotion and that his example strengthened
others’ loyalty to the law since he did not abolish (kate/lusaj) the
holiness of which he spoke (7,9).
The remainder of 4 Maccabees relates the martyrdoms of seven
brothers and their mother. Ironically, it is the machinations of An-
tiochus, not the laws, which are abolished. Through reason the Jews
abolished his tyranny (8,15; 11,24), abolished the fear of tortures
(14,8), abolished Antiochus’s violence (17,2), and brought about
Antiochus’s own abolishment (11,25). These five occurrences of
J.W. VAN HENTEN, The Maccabean Martyrs as Saviours of the Jewish
10
People. A Study of 2 and 4 Maccabees (JSJSup 57; Leiden 1997) 70-73. This
increased frequency coincides with the argument of H.-J. KLAUCK (4
Makkabäerbuch [JSHRZ; Gütersloh 1989] 664-665) that the author is trying
to persuade Jews not to assimilate to the wider culture.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati