Tucker S. Ferda, ««Sealed» with the Holy Spirit (Eph 1,13-14) and Circumcision», Vol. 93 (2012) 557-579
Most studies of Eph 1’s «sealed with the promised Holy Spirit» have tried to articulate the Christian ritual or experience that the sealing metaphor describes, such as baptism, confirmation, charismatic gifts, etc. This article, however, refocuses on the theological logic of vv. 13-14 to argue that, regardless of the Christian rite described, the author here explicates that rite by referring to circumcision with the use of the verb «sealed». The argument includes the insight that the description of «sealed» in Eph 1,13-14 corresponds to other texts that describe circumcision as a final step in Jewish proselytism.
05_Biblica_1_A_Ferda_Layout 1 30/01/13 13:17 Pagina 568
568 TUCKER S. FERDA
1,5, where Paul reminds his hearers of their initial reception of the
Spirit, and as in Acts 15,8.12, where Peter and Paul recount the ex-
perience of the Spirit in Gentile communities, so too in Eph 1,13-
14, AE tells his Gentile hearers that they were “sealed with the
promised Holy Spirit†and therefore guaranteed the inheritance and
redemption promised to members of God’s house 36. It is clear, then,
that when AE says “sealed with the promised Holy Spiritâ€, regard-
less of the rite or experience here described, the theological import
is that God has brought the Ephesians into the community of God
and guaranteed to them the blessings of the covenant 37.
Now, if it is true as suggested to this point that Eph 1,13-14 makes
the Holy Spirit the identity marker for Gentiles who were once “far offâ€
but have now been “brought near by the blood of Christ†(Eph 2,13),
then God’s Spirit functions as circumcision in some Jewish circles: “You
shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskins, and it will be a sign of the
covenant between me and you†(Gen 17,11) 38. Is this just coincidence?
Or could AE be deliberately evoking circumcision at this point?
One can make a good case for an affirmative answer to that ques-
tion given the probability that “seal†was used for circumcision as
early as the first century CE. Most see Paul himself in Romans 4 as
the earliest datable witness (which is an important text, to be sure, and
will be discussed below), but two prior observations can be made.
First, an argument from common sense. It was noted above that as
early as the second century CE Christians were using “seal†to refer to
baptism, and maybe they were doing it even earlier 39. Why? Probably
On the Holy Spirit as an eschatological sign and an identity marker, see
36
R. BULTMANN, Theology of the New Testament (trans. K. GROBEL) (New York,
NY 1951) I, 41; F.F. BRUCE, Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free (Grand Rapids,
MI 1977) 140; R.G. DEASLY, “The Holy Spirit in the Dead Sea Scrollsâ€, WTJ
21 (1986) 45-73; P.R. THORSELL, “The Spirit in the Present Age: Preliminary
Fulfillment of the Predicted New Covenant According to Paulâ€, JETS 41 (1998)
398; R.J. MORALES, “The Words of the Luminaries, the Curse of the Law, and
the Outpouring of the Spirit in Gal 3,10-14â€, ZNW 100 (2009) 269-277.
See N.T. WRIGHT, Paul for Everyone. The Prison Epistles (London
37
2004) 13.
2
For discussion of the diverse views on circumcision, as reflected in the
38
apparatus for Gen 17,14, see M. THIESSEN, “The Text of Genesis 17,14â€, JBL
128 (2009) 625-642.
Cf. J.C. LAMBERT, The Sacraments of the New Testament. Being the
39
Kerr Lectures for 1903 (Edinburgh – New York 1903); D.G. DIX, “Confir-
mation or Laying on of Hands?†(London 1936). Lambert and Dix contrast
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati