Bradley C. Gregory, «Slips of the Tongue in the Speech Ethics of Ben Sira», Vol. 93 (2012) 321-339
This article examines the references to slips of the tongue in the speech ethics of Ben Sira. Against the background of Proverbs, this characterization of accidental speech errors represents a new development. Its origin can be traced to the confluence between sapiential metaphors for mistakes in life and the idea of a slip of the tongue in the Hellenistic world. Ben Sira’s references to slips of the tongue are generally coordinated with a lack of discipline, though at least two verses seem to suggest that slips are not always sinful and that they represent a universal phenomenon, found even among the wisest sages.
		
			01_Biblica_1_F_Gregory_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:13 Pagina 327
                                                                                       327
                          SLIPS OF THE TONGUE IN THE SPEECH ETHICS OF BEN SIRA
                with public speaking in 13,21-23 10. Ben Sira’s characterization of
                some speech errors as falls, stumbles, or slips is, then, a natural ex-
                tension of this motif. In addition, this metaphor for speech errors
                comports well with Ben Sira’s anthropology. While it is true that
                Ben Sira affirms “free will†and views human moral choices in es-
                sentially voluntaristic terms 11, there is also a certain ambivalence,
                even nervousness on his part that inclinations to sin tend to gain
                momentum until the sinner has lost control to make good choices.
                Nowhere is this ambivalence clearer than in the subject of speech
                ethics 12. Not only does Ben Sira portray the tongue as something
                constantly threatening to break loose and wreak havoc, but several
                of his major discussions of speech ethics (5,9 – 6,1; 19,4-17; 23,7-
                15) are juxtaposed with discussions of out-of-control passion (6,2-
                4; 18,30 – 19,3; 22,27 – 23,6), which suggests that the two are
                connected in his thought. Thus, like Proverbs, Ben Sira views
                speech as an indicator of someone’s character, but the particular
                configuration of his views of anthropology and the nature of sin re-
                sult in a view of speech that includes a view of the tongue as being
                prone to slip out of control. Among the additional passages where
                the context and the evidence of the versions strongly suggest that
                the idea of a slip of the tongue can be attributed to Ben Sira rather
                than being only a conceptual gloss by his grandson, the clearest
                case shows just this kind of extension in the concept of “slippingâ€.
                1. A Slip of the Tongue as a Poorly Timed Statement (Sir 20,18)
                   After a pericope on the proper timing of a reproof and of silence
                (20,1-8), Ben Sira records a series of paradoxes in 20,9-17. Then
                in vv. 18-20 he returns to the subject of speech ethics. He observes:
                        As water poured out on a stone rock,
                                  so is the tongue of the wicked among the righteous.
                   10
                       On this passage see J. CORLEY, Ben Sira’s Teaching on Friendship (BJS
                316; Providence, RI 2002) 119-53.
                    11
                       J. HADOT, Penchant mauvais et volonté libre dans la sagesse de Ben
                Sira (Bruxelles 1970) 153-76, 193-206.
                    12
                       G. BOCCACCINI, Middle Judaism. Jewish Thought, 300 B.C.E. to 200
                C.E. (Minneapolis, MN 1991) 99-104.