Mark Reasoner, «The Redemptive Inversions of Jeremiah in Romans 9–11», Vol. 95 (2014) 388-404
This article presents seven points of focused dissonance between Jeremiah and Romans, by identifying how Romans 9–11 inverts the judgment language of Jeremiah 1–20 against Judah. Without claiming that the inversions in Romans 9–11 are intentional, the article argues that the inversions of this section of Jeremiah are similar to the inversions that Deutero-Isaiah performs on this same section of Jeremiah, identified by B. Sommer. The inversions of Jeremiah that occur in Romans 9–11 highlight these chapters' positive stance toward corporeal, ethnic Israel, and provide another argument against interpreting 'all Israel' in Rom 11,26 as the church.
04_Reasoner_388-404 28/10/14 10:43 Pagina 398
398 MARK REASONER
text of Jeremiah and the text of Romans. Those in the field of liter-
ature are sometimes more alert to this sort of dissonant intertextu-
ality than we students of the New Testament are, who tend to look
for quotations or positive allusions when we attempt to retrace
Paul’s exegesis. Purists among my readers have my permission to
cringe at the following examples. Though their contexts are far re-
moved from the New Testament’s use of the Old Testament, I offer
the following examples of the anxiety of influence, just so we can
be more alert to it within the Christian canon of scripture. The “sa-
cred parody” of the 17th century British poets, especially George
Herbert, took secular conventions and inverted them or adapted
them for sacred purposes. Jane Austen’s “Northanger Abbey” par-
odies Gothic romance by making fun of characters’ imaginations
(such as they would be shown in Gothic romances) as she moves
toward more realistic fiction. Similar phenomena occur in other
genres: the impressionist Debussy quotes Wagner the romanticist
and then introduces laughing sounds to show his rejection of such
musical phrasing 30.
Harold Bloom’s “The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry”
suggests five ways in which authors display dissonant intertextu-
ality in relation to antecedent texts. In his discussion of one of these
ways, what Bloom calls “Daemonization or The Counter-Sublime”,
he writes, “So many songs of triumph, read close, begin to appear
rituals of separation, that a wary reader may wonder if the truly
strong poet ever has any antagonist beyond the self and its strongest
precursor” 31. Is there a sense in which Jeremiah is a strong, or the
“strongest precursor” for Paul, against whom Paul is asserting his
independence?
I will not allow my argument to rest on the personae of Paul and
Jeremiah to explain the anxiety of influence Paul perhaps experi-
enced regarding Jeremiah. But the biographical contours of these
two messengers to the nations are remarkably similar 32. Paul, a
member of the tribe of Benjamin (Rom 11,1), designated apostle
30
DEBUSSY, “Golliwogg’s Cakewalk” (a movement from Children’s Cor-
ner) quoting from WAGNER, Tristan und Isolde.
31
H. BLOOM, The Anxiety of Influence. A Theory of Poetry (London 1973) 110.
32
With special attention to Galatians, EASTMAN (Recovering Paul’s
Mother Tongue, 67-68, 76-84) highlights similarities in prophetic call, self-
presentation and suffering that Paul shares with Jeremiah.