Mark Reasoner, «The Redemptive Inversions of Jeremiah in Romans 9–11», Vol. 95 (2014) 388-404
This article presents seven points of focused dissonance between Jeremiah and Romans, by identifying how Romans 9–11 inverts the judgment language of Jeremiah 1–20 against Judah. Without claiming that the inversions in Romans 9–11 are intentional, the article argues that the inversions of this section of Jeremiah are similar to the inversions that Deutero-Isaiah performs on this same section of Jeremiah, identified by B. Sommer. The inversions of Jeremiah that occur in Romans 9–11 highlight these chapters' positive stance toward corporeal, ethnic Israel, and provide another argument against interpreting 'all Israel' in Rom 11,26 as the church.
04_Reasoner_388-404 28/10/14 10:43 Pagina 399
THE REDEMPTIVE INVERSIONS OF JEREMIAH IN ROMANS 9–11 399
to the nations from his mother’s womb, would find it dangerous en
route to Jerusalem to cite Jeremiah the member of Benjamin who
is designated prophet to the nations from his mother’s womb, for
Jeremiah is the prophet with connections to the house of Eli and
Abiathar who relativizes the Jerusalem temple by equating it with
the tabernacle at Shiloh 33. Paul is anxious for a better reception in
Jerusalem than Jeremiah received 34. But these connections, tempt-
ing as they are within psychological analysis, have no place in an
argument that is simply finding some dissonant intertextuality be-
tween Jeremiah 1–20 and Romans 9–11 while making no claim re-
garding Paul’s intentions. Let us return to the literary comparison
of Romans 9–11 with the opening chapters of Jeremiah.
III. Intertextuality That Avoids Quotation
We can fill out our understanding of the relationship between
Romans 9–11 and these opening chapters of Jeremiah by returning
to B. Sommer’s work on intertextuality between Jeremiah and
Deutero-Isaiah. Sommer’s identification of “reversals” that
Deutero-Isaiah employs seems to be the most helpful analogy for
what is going on here between the text of Romans 9–11 and Jere-
miah. Sommer documents how Deutero-Isaiah uses material from
Jeremiah, including material from chapter 2 and chapter 10. These
chapters are in the same section of Jeremiah that I am suggesting
Romans 9–11 redemptively inverts 35. Sommer argues that Deutero-
Isaiah, even with these reversals, “reinforces Jeremiah’s position
as a prophet, because in repeating Jeremiah’s words in the form
proper for his own day he brings them new validity” 36. One exam-
ple he offers is the use of language from Jeremiah’s letter to the ex-
iles in Babylon, telling them to settle, build houses and plant
gardens in Babylon (Jer 29,4-6), which Isaiah 65 then inverts by
using the same language for what will happen in Jerusalem (Isa
65,18-23). This sort of adaptation may be what is happening in Ro-
mans 9–11, a text so tenaciously certain of Israel’s future salvation
33
Jer 1,1.5; Gal 1,15-16; see Jer 7,1-15 and the discussion in J.D. LEVEN-
SON, Sinai and Zion (San Francisco, CA 1985) 165-169.
34
Rom 15,30-32; Jer 38,1-28.
35
SOMMER, A Prophet Reads Scripture, 36-40.
36
SOMMER, A Prophet Reads Scripture, 41.