Mark Reasoner, «The Redemptive Inversions of Jeremiah in Romans 9–11», Vol. 95 (2014) 388-404
This article presents seven points of focused dissonance between Jeremiah and Romans, by identifying how Romans 9–11 inverts the judgment language of Jeremiah 1–20 against Judah. Without claiming that the inversions in Romans 9–11 are intentional, the article argues that the inversions of this section of Jeremiah are similar to the inversions that Deutero-Isaiah performs on this same section of Jeremiah, identified by B. Sommer. The inversions of Jeremiah that occur in Romans 9–11 highlight these chapters' positive stance toward corporeal, ethnic Israel, and provide another argument against interpreting 'all Israel' in Rom 11,26 as the church.
04_Reasoner_388-404 28/10/14 10:43 Pagina 389
THE REDEMPTIVE INVERSIONS OF JEREMIAH IN ROMANS 9–11 389
whose excised branches will be grafted in again, because God’s
word toward Israel has not failed.
By “dissonant intertextuality”, I mean what Sommer means by
“reversal”. Dissonant intertextuality is the use a text makes of an
antecedent text in a way that contradicts, reverses, or shifts the
focus of meaning of the antecedent text in order to fit a recogniz-
ably distinct agenda in the borrowing text 3.
Before we begin the comparisons that highlight the dissonant in-
tertextuality between Romans 9–11 and Jeremiah 1–20, it might be
useful to note that this section of Jeremiah figures elsewhere in the
Pauline corpus. Thus G. R. O’Day, following Fishbane’s presentation
of inner biblical exegesis as response to a crisis, has shown against
the dominant reading of 1 Cor 1,26-31 how that text uses Jer 9,22-23
to argue that the Corinthians’ wise, strong, and rich status is not what
they should glory in, but rather that these Corinthians should glory
in the cross 4. In that case only the object of the implied audience’s
boasting is changed. Jeremiah’s audience is to glory that they know
God; Paul asks his Corinthian audience to glory in Christ Jesus.
The boasting text of Jer 9,24 that Paul quotes in 1 Cor 1,31 and
2 Cor 10,17 also lies behind the boasting Paul describes in Rom 5,2.11.
More recently and closer to our passage, T. Berkley has argued
that Paul uses Jeremiah chapters 7 and 9 in Romans 2 5. As Paul
did in 1 Corinthians, Paul adjusts or inverts Jeremiah to express a
point for his Roman audience: Jeremiah says that “all the house of
Israel is uncircumcised in heart”, just like the Gentiles who practice
circumcision. Paul applies this in a straightforward way to the
boasting Jewish interlocuter of 2,25. Then Paul sharpens Jeremiah’s
criticism by stating in Rom 2,26 that uncircumcised Gentiles who
follow God’s decrees will be considered circumcised in heart 6. Even
D.-A. Koch, who argues against any direct quotations of Jeremiah
3
B. SOMMER, A Prophet Reads Scripture. Allusion in Isaiah 40–66 (Stan-
ford, CA 1988) 36-46.
4
G. R. O’DAY, “Jeremiah 9:22-23 and 1 Corinthians 1:26-31: A Study in
Intertextuality”, JBL 109 (1990) 265-266.
5
T. W. BERKLEY, From a Broken Covenant to a Circumcised Heart.
Pauline Intertextual Exegesis in Romans 2:17-29 (SBLDS 175; Atlanta, GA
2000) 82-90.
6
Berkley suggests that Paul can make this move, assigning the status of
circumcised to uncircumcised people, based on a reinterpretation of Genesis 17,