Floyd O. Parker, «Is the Subject of 'tetelestai' in John 19,30 'It' or 'All Things' ?», Vol. 96 (2015) 222-244
This article attempts to demonstrate that the unexpressed subject of tete/lestai in John 19,30 is 'all things' (pa/nta) rather than 'it', and that this subject should be supplied from the phrase pa/nta tete/lestai found earlier in the passage (John 19,28). The essay also argues that the two occurrences of 'all things' (John 18,4 and 19,28.30) encapsulate the passion narrative, and that this phrase is related to other Johannine themes in content and time frame (i.e. the 'hour', the 'cup', and the Passover).
04_Parker_222_244_222-244 10/07/15 12:41 Pagina 242
242 FLOYD O. PARKER JR. 242
rative is played out against the backdrop of this feast. The Passover
is referenced in the time leading up to (12,1; 13,1) and during the
passion account (18,28.39; 19,14). The Passover is even mentioned
once in the same verse as the “hour” (13,1). Moreover, Passover
imagery is specifically applied to Jesus in the passion narrative.
The hyssop (John 19,29) recalls the plant used to apply the lamb’s
blood to the doorposts and lintels during the first Passover (Exod
12,13) and, like the Passover lamb, Jesus’ legs were not broken
(John 19,36; Exod 12,46; Num 9,2; Ps 34,20). These Passover al-
lusions occur in proximity to Jesus’ climactic declaration that “all
things” were completed (19,30), thereby suggesting that the offer-
ing of Jesus, the lamb that would take away the sins of the world
(1,29.36), had been finished 65.
The final theme to explore is the “new creation” as it relates to
John 19,28.30. Several scholars have suggested that Jesus alluded
to Gen 2,2 with his last word tete,lestai 66. In this view, “It is fin-
ished” announced Jesus’ completion of the work the Father had sent
him to do (4,39; 5,36; 17,4.34). To be sure, several creation themes
seem to be sounded at the end of John, such as the “Sabbath”
(19,31; Gen 2,2), a “garden” (19,41; Gen 2,8), and the breathing of
the Spirit upon men (20,22; Gen 2,7).
Long before the “new creation” theology emerged in contem-
porary scholarship, Asterius the Sophist (d. 341 CE), in a homily
on the Psalms, had already explored the typological relationship
between the days of creation in Genesis and the days of Christ’s
final week. In his treatment of the events of the sixth day and the
sixth hour, he wrote the following:
Th|/ e[kth| evstaurw,qh dia. to.n a;nqrwpon. Kai. ouv mo,non
h`me,ra| e[kth|, avlla. kai. w[ran e[kthn evpi. to. xu,lon evkre,mato,
evpeidh. avrch. a`marti,aj w[ra| e[kth| avpo. tou/ xu,lou ge,gonen, o[te
vAda.m to.n qa,naton hvri,sthsen, ei=ta evpeidh. evn th|/ e[kth| h`me,ra|
kate,pausen avpo. pa,ntwn tw/n e;rgwn auvtou/ tw/n euvaggelikw/n
qauma,twn, o[te kai. to. o;xoj e;pie kai. ei=pe í Tete,lestai 67.
65
BROWN, The Death of the Messiah, II, 1078.
66
WRIGHT, Challenge of Jesus, 175-177; KÖSTENBERGER, Theology, 352-
353; BROWN, “Creation’s Renewal”, 175-290.
67
ASTERIUS, Commentarii in Psalmos, Homily 21.13.36. For the Greek
text see M. RICHARD, Asterii sophistae commentariorum in Psalmos quae su-
persunt (Symbolae Osloenses fasc. suppl. 16; Oslo 1956).