Walter T. Wilson, «Matthew, Philo, and Mercy for Animals (Matt 12,9-14)», Vol. 96 (2015) 201-221
After comparing Matt 12,11-12 with its synoptic parallels (Mark 3,4; Luke 13,15-16; 14,5) and with texts that discuss the treatment of animals on the Sabbath (e.g., CD 11.13-14), the passage is compared with Philonic texts (Spec. 2.89; 4.218; Virt. 81, 133, 139-140, 160; cf. Plutarch, Cato 5.5; Esu carn. 996A; Iamblichus, Vit. Pythag. 30.186; Porphyry, Abst. 3.26.6) in which the Alexandrian discerns a principle informing a law that refers to the treatment of animals, and then suggests that the principle applies by analogy to the treatment of people, illuminating the principle with reference to mercy and similar concepts.
03_Wilson_201_221_201_221 10/07/15 12:41 Pagina 219
219 MATTHEW, PHILO, AND MERCY FOR ANIMALS (MATT 12,9-14) 219
issue under discussion” but “[a]s a guide to Sabbath observance
could result in widely divergent practice”. Therefore, not unlike the
Golden Rule (7,12), the principles illustrated in 12,7.12 leave each
individual a fair amount of discretion to determine what the crite-
rion of doing “good” requires in a given situation 65. What is being
illustrated, then, is both an interpretation of practice as well as a
way of reasoning about practice in general. As Repschinski puts it,
in this passage “Matthew makes Jesus the teacher of the Law”, who
not only “can expose the Pharisaic teaching as illogical and hypo-
critical”, but also “propose an interpretation of the Law that is better
argued and more humanely applied”, thereby showing “the way to
the greater righteousness (5:17)” 66.
One final area of comparison between the two authors has to do
with the role assigned in this teaching/learning process to the ani-
mal world. Specifically, it is possible to discern a difference be-
tween the two with respect to assumptions that they make about
the basic nature of animals and their status in the order of creation.
One way to gain some insight in this regard is by comparing Matt
12,12a with similarly worded passages elsewhere in the Gospel.
Look at the birds of the air, that they do not sow, nor reap, nor gather
into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not
worth much more (ma/llon diafe,rete) than they? (Matt 6,26)
Are not two sparrows sold for a cent? And yet not one (e[n) of them
will fall to the ground apart from your Father … So do not fear; you
are more valuable (diafe,rete) than many sparrows. (Matt 10,29-31)
How much more valuable (po,sw| … diafe,rei) is a human being
than a sheep. (Matt 12,12a)
Matt 10,29-31 (cf. Luke 12,6-7) envisions a scenario in which
a sparrow is brought down by the hunter’s snare and subsequently
sold in the marketplace (cf. Amos 3,5; Gen. Rab. 79.6). This, says
Jesus, is something that does not happen a;neu tou/ patro,j, that is,
apart from divine knowledge and consent (cf. Job 38,41; Ps 147,9).
Here, as in Matt 6,26 (cf. Luke 12,24), Jesus’ comments are meant
65
R.T. FRANCE, The Gospel of Matthew (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI 2007) 465.
66
REPSCHINSKI, Controversy Stories, 115.