Yaacov Azuelos - Francesco Giosuè Voltaggio, «The 'angel sent from before the Lord' in Targum Joshua 5,14», Vol. 96 (2015) 161-178
The aim of this essay is to analyze the angelologic world of the Targum Jonathan of Joshua. The 'angels' in Josh 6,25 and 7,22 are considered in the Targum as 'messengers' of flesh and blood. Although 'angels' as noncorporeal emissaries of God do not appear explicitly in Joshua, 'the commander of the Lord’s army' in 5,15 is interpreted by the targumists as 'an angel sent from before the Lord'. After presenting his description in the Targum, we discuss his identity and mission. On the basis of biblical, pseudepigraphal and targumic sources, we claim that the angel is Michael.
01_AzuelosVoltaggio_161_178_161_178 29/07/15 10:58 Pagina 172
172 YAACOV AZUELOS – FRANCESCO GIOSUÈ VOLTAGGIO 172
that, in the first century CE, Michael’s identification as the chief-
captain of the heavenly armies was well accepted (the Third Book
of Baruch is thought to have been written in the late first century
CE, but contains earlier traditions). This is confirmed by the Dead
Sea Scrolls, as, for example, in the War Scroll, 1QM 17,6-8: “(God)
will send eternal support to the company of his redeemed by the
power of the majestic angel of the authority of Michael. By eternal
light He shall joyfully light up the covenant of Israel; peace and
blessing for the lot of God, to exalt the authority of Michael among
the gods (lakym trXm ~ylab ~yrhl) and the dominion of Israel
among all flesh”. The Dead Sea Scrolls reflect also a belief in a
specific principal angel, designated the “Angel of Truth”, “the
Prince of Light(s)”, or “Melchizedek”. This is probably the very
same angel identified as Michael 37.
In light of this background, the reasoning behind the insertion
by Targum Jonathan Josh 5,14-15 is clear: the “commander of the
Lord’s army” (hwhy-abc-rf), the “archistratege” (LXX), is the
“angel sent from before the Lord” (ywy ~dq !m xylX $alm). One
might ask why the targumist does not specify the identity of the
angel. Perhaps this is due to the prostration and “worship” by
Joshua in v. 15. The targumist follows the traditions of the Phar-
isees, who believed strongly in angels (in contrast to the Sadducees
who insisted on “angels” of flesh and blood, or as symbolic expres-
sions of God’s actions), while avoiding the hazards of explicit angel
worship, a strong temptation in the Second Temple period, espe-
cially in some circles, as attested in Targum Neofiti 38.
Various traditions and beliefs about the angel Michael flourished
both in Judaism of the Second Temple period and in early Chris-
tianity. The early Christian tradition and the Fathers of the Church
shared a common interpretation of Josh 5,13–15 with the Targums:
Origen 39 and Aphraates 40 also identify the “archistratege” in Josh
5,14-15 with the angel Michael. It is probable that Origen and
37
On the Archangel Michael in the Qumran literature, see HANNAH,
Michael and Christ, 55-75.
38
Cf., for example, Col 2,18.
39
See Origen, Sel. in Jos., PG 12.821. In Hom. In Jos. 6.2, however, Ori-
gen identifies the figure with Christ, as does Justin (see n. 42 below).
40
APHRAATES, Dem. 3.14.