Iwan M. Whiteley, «Cataphora and Lack of Clarity in the Book of Revelation», Vol. 21 (2008) 75-90
This article argues that John adopts a lack of clarity as a strategy for communication in the Book of Revelation. This lack of clarity can be identified in his use of the asyndeton, καί, anarthrous nouns and cataphora. His use of cataphora is investigated in three areas; in Revelation 1, in his use of
ἃ δεῖ γενέσθαι and the colours of the horses. The conclusion is that exegetes should not impose readings on passages in Revelation that are, in themselves, inherently unclear. Instead, they should wait until John clarifies his own ambiguity so that the full rhetorical force of the text can be provided.
84 Iwan M. Whiteley
tual relationship with Zechariah yet the deviation in Revelation is suffi-
cient so that the reader is inclined to conclude that the significance of the
colours is initially unclear; it seems that to understand their significance
in Revelation, one needs to focus on the Revelation text and not Zecha-
riah. The use of all these colours in one passage is rare in biblical texts,
yet all of these colours appear again in Revelation. The colour white is
influenced by a number of factors and as a consequence requires qualifi-
cation. It seems that the reader initially reads these unusual colours and
struggles to isolate an anaphoric connection. Therefore, when the colours
appear again later in the letter, the reader realizes that the later text is
interacting with Revelation 6:1-8:
Horse Colour Later Reference(s) in Revelation
White 7:9, 13f, 14:14, 19:11, 14, 20:11
Fiery Red 12:3
Black 6:12
Green 8:7, 9:4
Any proposition that claims to make links in the macro text of
Revelation runs into difficulty. Current scholarship has conceptually
fragmented the Revelation discourse into what appear to be small units
of mutually exclusive ideas. In this environment, it is very difficult to
identify flow and development in the discourse. Consequently, it is not
possible to exegete the whole of Revelation to demonstrate the validity
of the cataphoric proposition as related here. However, it will be demon-
strated that the reader would have naturally associated the later reference
to their original use in the context of the four horsemen. We shall now
investigate each coloured horse.
The colour white is used 14 times in Revelation; 6 times before the
reference to the rider on the white horse (6:2) and 7 times after. The
tion and Commentary (AB, New York: Doubleday, 1988,) 111-113; C. Stuhlmueller, Re-
building with Hope: A Commentary on the Books of Haggai and Zechariah (International
Theological commentary; Edinburgh, Eerdmans, 1988) 62; P. Redditt, Haggai, Zechariah
and Malachi (The New Century Bible Commentary; London, Marshall Pickering, 1995)
75. D. Petersen, Haggai and Zechariah 1-8: A Commentary (OTL; London, SCM Press,
1985) 269; M. Sweeney, The Twelve Prophets Volume 2: Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk,
Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi (Berit Olam Studies in Hebrew Narrative and
Poetry; Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2000) 625; T. McComiskey, The Minor
Prophets: An Exegetical and Expository Commentary vol. 3 (Grand Rapids: Baker Book
House, 1998) 1106; E. Merrill, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi: An Exegetical Commentary
(Chicago: Moody, 1994) 184; J. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi: An Introduction and
Commentary (The Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries; London, Tyndale Press, 1972)
138-140; B. Peachey, ‘A Horse of a Different Colour, the Horses in Zechariah and Revela-
tion’ ExpTim 110 (1998-1999) 214-216.