Cornelis Bennema, «The Sword of the Messiah and the Concept of Liberation in the Fourth Gospel», Vol. 86 (2005) 35-58
This article elucidates the Johannine concept of Jesus’
"sword" as the means of liberation against a background of Palestinian messianic
apocalypticism. It is argued that the Johannine Jesus is depicted as a messiah
who liberates the world at large from the spiritual oppression of sin and the
devil by means of his Spirit-imbued word of truth. In addition, Jesus also
provides physical, social, religious and political liberation. Jesus’ programme
of holistic liberation is continued by his disciples through the transference of
his "sword" in the form of their Paraclete-imbued witness.
36 Cornelis Bennema
drama unfolding before them†(5). Accordingly, Palestinian messianic
apocalypticism expected God’s cataclysmic liberation of his people to
happen through his messiah.
It is against this background that we shall understand Jesus and his
movement. This raises various questions. What was Jesus’ concept of
liberation? Whom and from whom did he liberate? How did Jesus
accomplish his goal? Were Jesus and his followers quietists or
activists? We will address these questions from the perspective of the
Fourth Gospel. Hence, the aim of this article is to elucidate how the
Johannine messiah will liberate God’s people and establish a new age
of justice and peace. As far as I am aware, in the past thirty years, only
a few works have contributed to the subject of liberation in the Fourth
Gospel (6), and the Johannine concept of Jesus’ “sword†as the means
of liberation is an entirely untouched subject. We shall argue that,
within the historical-political context of revolutionary Judaism and the
literary context of Palestinian messianic apocalypticism, the Fourth
Gospel presents Jesus as a messiah who liberates the world at large by
means of his Spirit-imbued word and who hands over this “sword†to
his followers to continue his mission in the world.
We shall start to examine the concept of the messiah as a liberator
in the Palestinian apocalyptic traditions (section I) as a possible
background against which to understand the Johannine Jesus. Then,
in section II, we will turn to the Fourth Gospel and elucidate the
concepts of oppression, liberation and Jesus’ “swordâ€, as well as the
transfer of this “sword†to the disciples. Finally, we shall make some
conclusions.
(5) ROWLAND, Origins, 99. Sociologically, the apocalyptic literature came
from the oppressed or a group in crisis rather than from the ruling class
(G.W.E. NICKELSBURG, “Social Aspects of Palestinian Jewish Apocalypticismâ€,
Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East [ed. D.
HELLHOLM] [Tübingen 21989] 641-654).
(6) F. HERZOG, Liberation Theology. Liberation in the Light of the Fourth
Gospel (New York 1972); J.P. MIRANDA, Being and the Messiah. The Message of
St. John (Maryknoll 1977); S. RAYAN, “Jesus and the Poor in the Fourth Gospelâ€,
Bible Bhashyam 4 (1978) 213-228; D. RENSBERGER, Johannine Faith and
Liberating Community (Philadelphia 1988); R.J. KARRIS, Jesus and the
Marginalized in John’s Gospel (Collegeville 1990); W. HOWARD-BROOK,
Becoming Children of God. John’s Gospel and Radical Discipleship (Maryknoll
1994); S. MOTYER, “Jesus and the Marginalised in the Fourth Gospelâ€, Mission
and Meaning. Essays Presented to Peter Cotterell (eds. A. BILLINGTON – T. LANE
– M. TURNER) (Carlisle 1995) 70-89.