Gregory T.K. Wong, «Song of Deborah as Polemic», Vol. 88 (2007) 1-22
Focusing on its rhetorical structure, this article argues that the Song of Deborah in Judg 5 may have been composed not so much primarily to celebrate a victory, but to serve as a polemic against Israelite non-participation in military campaigns
against foreign enemies. Possible implications of such a reading on the song’s relationship with the prose account in Judg 4 and its date of composition are also explored.
6 Gregory T.K. Wong
ongoing theme in the rest of the song as those who took part in battle
are praised while those who refused to are censured, one can argue that
this introductory refrain in fact serves as a preview of a basic concern
of the whole song, a concern that has more to do with the people’s
willingness to participate during a time of national crisis rather than
the simple celebration of victory itself.
The second indication that a significant concern of the song has to
do with the issue of participation (or lack thereof) is found in the
structural bracketing of vv. 11d-13. In his analysis, Vincent argues that
after the second refrain in v. 9 and the accompanying command to
ponder in vv. 10-11c, the rest of the section is roughly divided into
three subsections: vv. 11d-13, vv. 14-18 and vv. 19-22. He argues that
the fourfold repetition of za in vv. 11d.13.19.22 actually functions as a
structural marker that gives rise to two sets of inclusios, bracketing vv.
11d-13 as one stanza and vv. 19-22 as another, leaving the remaining
unmarked material in between as a third stanza (16). But what is of
interest here is that in the first stanza comprising vv. 11d-13, the
inclusio is marked not only by za, but perhaps more significantly, also
by the mention of “the people of YHWH (hwhyAµ[)†and the description
of them “going down (dry)â€, presumably to participate in battle against
the enemy (17). This use of the participation of YHWH’s people as a
structural marker even for a relatively short stanza thus again
highlights this theme of participation as a key focus within the song.
Third, in the stanza comprising vv. 14-18, where the tribes that
participated are listed along with those that did not, it is worth noting
that structurally, the implied rebukes against the non-participating
tribes are sandwiched between implied praises for the tribes that did
participate:
(16) VINCENT, “Songâ€, 74-75.
(17) It is admittedly unclear where the strophe break is and whether v. 11d
should be read with what immediately precedes in v. 11a-c, thus referring to
participation in victory celebration, or with what immediately follows, thus
referring to an earlier gathering to participate in battle. SOGGIN, Judges, 87-88,
seems to take the former view, but D.I. BLOCK, Judges, Ruth (The New American
Commentary; Nashville, 1999) 230, arguing that the mention of “gates (µyr[ç)†in
v. 11d is an echo of v. 8 where the same word is mentioned in the context of war,
sees v. 11d as a thesis statement to vv. 12-18. If v. 11d is indeed crafted to function
as part of an inclusio together with v. 13, then BLOCK’s view seems more likely
since the reference to the people going down with the mighty ones in v. 13 seems to
introduce what follows in vv. 14-18. Such a reading would then understand v. 11d
as the beginning of the actual recounting referred to in v. 11b-c.