Joel White, «Anti-Imperial Subtexts in Paul: An Attempt at Building a Firmer Foundation», Vol. 90 (2009) 305-333
This article argues that, though it cannot be doubted that there is a subversive quality to Paul’s letters, attempts to identify subversive subtexts have failed due to their preoccupation with what is deemed inherently subversive vocabulary. A better approach to grounding Paul’s anti-imperial theology is to recognize that he affirmed the subversive late Second temple Jewish-apocalyptic, and particularly Danielic, narrative that viewed Rome as final earthly kingdom that will be destroyed by the coming of God’s kingdom.
Anti-Imperial Subtexts in Paul 313
b) 1 Thess 5,3
The second passage to be considered is 1 Thess 5,3: “When they
say, ‘peace and security’ destruction will come upon them suddenly,
just as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will
certainly not be able to escapeâ€. The doublet “peace and securityâ€
(eijrhvnh kai; ajsfavleia) is taken by a great many recent commentators
to be a slogan summing up the benefits of the pax romana. They
maintain that Paul references it in an attempt to subvert the imperial
ideology by exposing the reality of Roman aggression. This interpre-
tation likewise goes beyond the evidence. While there can be no doubt
that both words are often used in Roman imperial propaganda, the
commonplace assumption that the Latin phrase pax et securitas lies
behind the doublet, and further, that it was a well-worn Roman slogan
cannot be sustained. The many supporters of this contention offer
countless examples of the use of either one word or the other in
imperial literature, coins, and inscriptions, but not both together (36).
My search of the Perseus database revealed no instances of the slogan
in the Latin works. Further, it is not even certain that, at the time Paul
was writing 1 Thessalonians, the Roman propaganda machine was
making broad use of both concepts. While the pax-ideology was
standard fare under the Julio-Claudian emperors beginning with
Augustus, the securitas-component seems to have taken on importance
only later. It played virtually no role in imperial propaganda under
Tiberius, Caligula, and Claudius (37). It was only during the latter part of
Nero’s reign that “eine verstärkte Propagierung von pax und securitas
einsetzt†(38). For this reason, Holtz’s conclusion that the doublet in 1
Thess 5,3 contains no allusion to the propaganda of the early Roman
empire seems reasonable (39), especially in light of the fact that a
(36) Cf. especially the plethora of primary source material that C. VOM BROCKE
has amassed in Thessaloniki, Stadt des Kassander und Gemeinde des Paulus. Eine
frühe christliche Gemeinde in ihrer heidnischen Umwelt (WUNT 2/125;
Tübingen 2001) 167-185.
(37) Cf. A. KNEPPE, Metus temporum. Zur Bedeutung von Angst in Politik und
Gesellschaft der römischen Kaiserzeit des 1. und 2. Jhdts. n. Chr. (Stuttgart 1994)
233.
(38) KNEPPE, Metus, 271.
(39) Cf. T. HOLTZ, Der erste Brief an die Thessalonicher (EKK XIII; Zürich
1986) 215, n. 364.