Joel White, «Anti-Imperial Subtexts in Paul: An Attempt at Building a Firmer Foundation», Vol. 90 (2009) 305-333
This article argues that, though it cannot be doubted that there is a subversive quality to Paul’s letters, attempts to identify subversive subtexts have failed due to their preoccupation with what is deemed inherently subversive vocabulary. A better approach to grounding Paul’s anti-imperial theology is to recognize that he affirmed the subversive late Second temple Jewish-apocalyptic, and particularly Danielic, narrative that viewed Rome as final earthly kingdom that will be destroyed by the coming of God’s kingdom.
324 Joel White
concerned the time at which the world ruler would appear together
with Josephus’ statement noted above that Daniel alone among the
prophets gave indication as to when the events he prophesied would
occur make it virtually certain that he had Dan 9,24-27 in mind.
These references support Beckwith’s contention, referred to above,
that in the late Second Temple period Jews of various ideological bents
attempted to calculate the time of the appearance of the Messiah based
on their reading of Dan 9,24-27. The well-documented heightening of
messianic expectation during that period clearly shows that, although
they might have quibbled with each other about the details of the
timing, all expected that the end of the age would soon be upon them.
3. The Abomination of Desolation (Dan 9,27; 11,31; 12,11)
Gabriel’s revelation to Daniel concerning the seventy weeks of
years ends with the announcement that the temple cult will cease
during the final week, and an “abomination of desolationâ€, as the term
has been traditionally rendered (LXX: bdevlugma tw'n ejrhmwvsewn), will
be set up in its place (Dan 9,26-27). The same phrase is repeated in
11,31 and 12,11, and on all three occasions the abomination of
desolation is closely connected to the cessation of sacrifice in the
temple. It is therefore likely that in each case the referent is the same.
My concern, however, is not to determine what the phrase referred to in
its original context but, once again, to assess its Wirkungsgeschichte in
early Judaism (62).
a. The author of 1 Maccabees explicitly associates the abomination of
desolation with the desecration of the Temple carried out by
Antiochus Epiphanes IV in 167 B.C.E. Cf. 1 Macc 1,54: “Now on
the fifteenth day of Chislev, in the one hundred forty-fifth year,
they erected a desolating sacrilege [bdevlugma ejrhmwvsew"] on the
altar of burnt offeringâ€.
b. The Synoptic Gospels ascribe to Jesus a warning in the eschato-
logical discourse that “when you see the abomination of desolation
(both Matthew and Mark have to;. bdevlugma th'" ejrhmwvsew"; Matt
24,15; Mark 13,14) standing in the holy place (Mark: “where it
ought not to beâ€), then those in Judea must flee to the hillsâ€. While
skepticism about the attribution of this logion to Jesus remains
strong in some scholarly circles, first century Jewish Christians in
Jerusalem seemed to have entertained no doubts as to its prophetic
(62) On which, cf. D. WENHAM, “Abomination of Desolationâ€, ABD I, 28-31.