Stephan Witetschek, «Artemis and Asiarchs. Some Remarks on Ephesian Local Colour in Acts 19», Vol. 90 (2009) 334-355
Luke’s account about Paul’s stay in Ephesos (Acts 19) is well known for its strong local colour, two elements of which are studied in this contribution: the asiarchs (19,31) and the title newko/roj (temple-warden) for Ephesos (19,35). The appearance of asiarchs in Acts questions the view that the asiarchs were the highpriests of the provincial imperial cult. Acts 19,35 contributes to the discussion about city-titles in the 1st-3rd centuries CE. In both instances, Acts is a source not so much for the narrated time of Paul, but rather for Luke’s own time, and as such of interest for both exegetes and historians.
336 Stephan Witetschek
In other words: Rich and precise local detail indicates only that a
particular incident could have happened in the way it is narrated, it
does not automatically prove that the event did happen in the way it is
narrated; strictly spoken, local detail in itself does not even prove that
the event happened at all.
To be sure, this rule has not gone unchallenged, especially with
regard to the genre of Acts as a non-fictional text: Luke wrote about
real, historical persons and about events that had really happened, so
the argument runs, and therefore his work cannot be compared to and
measured by the standards of a 19th-century novel (8). However, the
question of the genre and historical reliability of Acts cannot be
reduced to the dichotomy “Fiction — Accurate report of factsâ€. Even if
one does not consider Acts as an ancient novel (9) and if one grants that
the subject of Acts are events in an identifiable past (which allows
considering the book, at least in a broad sense, as a piece of historio-
graphy), this does not automatically make Acts a straightforward and
“objective†account of “what really happenedâ€. If nothing else, at least
Luke’s selectivity in the account of Paul’s travels (no collection, no
trouble with the Corinthians) indicates that he has a very particular
agenda; numerous other elements could be added, such as the idealised
presentation of the Jerusalem community in Acts 1–5. It seems, then,
that the ajsfavleia promised in Luke 1,4 is not identical with
historiographic objectivity and accuracy in a positivistic sense. To cut
short what is a fairly complex, but by all means worthwhile discussion:
It seems most appropriate to understand Acts as a piece of what may be
called intentional or even constructive historiography, historiography
that is meant to recall the memory of foundations and thus to shape the
audience’s identity in their own time, to construct an image of the past
that is meaningful and helpful for the present. In other words:
“Im Modus apologetischer Geschichtsschreibung zeichnet Lukas in
der Apostelgeschichte das Gedächtnisbild des Urchristentums,
genauer: ein bewegtes und bewegendes Gedächtnisgemälde von
Herkunft und Anfang des Christentums. Er verankert die relationale
Apostles (BGBE 17; Tübingen 1975), Erasmus 28 (1976) 65-68, 67-68. Karl May
(1842-1912), a German novelist, is famous for his novels set in the American
West and in the Middle East — and for never having travelled to the places he so
vividly describes.
(8) Cf. E.J. SCHNABEL, Urchristliche Mission (Wuppertal 2002) 26-27.
(9) Novelistic elements are pointed out by R.I. PERVO, Profit with Delight. The
Literary Genre of the Acts of the Apostles (Philadelphia, PA 1987).