Bernardo Estrada, «The Last Beatitude. Joy in Suffering.», Vol. 91 (2010) 187-209
The motive of joy in suffering for Jesus' sake, makes the last beatitude in Matt 5,11-12 and Luke 6,22-23 different from the former blessings. The persecution form present in this beatitude seems to be an authentic saying of Jesus, subsequently widespread in NT literature. Such a motive, in fact, does not appear in Judaism and in intertestamental or in apocryphal literature. The First Letter of Peter is instead a special witness of 'joy in suffering'.
205
THE LAST BEATITUDE. JOY SUFFERING
IN
2. For Jesus Christ’s Sake
The linking of the three texts comes not only from their lexical
forms, but also from the similitude and harmony of thought. Behind
the passages lies a climactic discourse about trials and persecutions.
1 Pet 1,6 (eı deon [est¥n] lyphuentev en poikıloiv peirasmoıv)
ߥ ßı ¥ ß ¥ ˜
considers a possibility in the future; the conditional clause in 1 Pet
3,14 with the optative (eı kaù pasxoite dia dikaiosynhn,
ß ı¥ ù ¥
makarioi) points to a not remote contingency. The conditional with
Â¥
the indicative in 1 Pet 4,14 (eı oneid¥zesue en onomati Xristoy,
ßß ı ß ß¥ ˜
makarioi) presumes instead a real eventuality, a persecution that
Â¥
fits well with its pastoral situation: “For they were not an experience
(that would have called for the present or perfect participle) but an
event, and an event pregnant with meaning†95. There are some
guidelines traced in this passage:
– trials are the means used by God to prove the believer’s faith;
– rejoicing in suffering allows them to share Christ’s tribulations
and later his glory;
– the faithful always experience, in different ways, the future
glory that awaits them 96.
The doxologies in 4,11 (ına en pasin dojazhtai o Ueov) and in
™ß˜ ù Ω ¥
4,16 (dojazetw de ton Ueon) set a framework of glorification in the
¥ ùù ß
midst of trials that are interpreted as part and parcel of the new era 97.
The controversy between Gundry and Best concerning Jesus’
logia and gospel tradition in 1 Pet is very instructive. Gundry holds
the existence of verba Christi in the letter. Some examples would be
1 Pet 1,6; 2,12; 3,14 and 4,13. He concludes that “only Petrine
authorship of the Epistle and authenticity of the gospel-passages
adequately account for the Petrine pattern of the Verba Christi†98.
Cf. SELWYN, First Peter, 127.
95
Cf. J.L. DE VILLIERS, “Joy in Suffering in I Peterâ€, Neot 9 (1975) 81.
96
Cf. G.L. BORCHERT, “The Conduct of Christians in the Face of the
97
‘Fiery Ordeal’ (1Peter 4.12-5.11)â€, RevExp 79 (1982) 453. Cf. Ez 38,39; Dan
7,21-7 ; 12,1; Joel 2; Hab 3,3-16; Zeph 1-3; Zach 11-14.
C f . R.H. GUNDRY , “‘Verba Christi’ in 1 Pe t e r : the Implications
98
Concerning the Authorship of 1 Peter and the Authenticity of the Gospel
Tradition â€, NTS 13 (1966/67) 342-343.350.