Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
181
THE VULNERABLE AUTHORITY AUTHOR
OF THE
unique way the readers of his gospel. One could simply say that the
paradoxes do not only function as a criterion for the reader to judge
the characters. They are equally a standard of judgment for the
readers themselves! “Paradoxes are a reminder to the reader that the
orientation suggested by the author opposes normal and reasonable
thoughts and expectations at any point†51. It is typical for the
paradoxical language of Jesus that these new values are expressed in
simple and well known words that are given a completely new
meaning. This new meaning is meant to confuse readers, old and
new ones 52. Words do not mean what they stand for. Accepted
associations connected with simple words of the Jewish-Hellenistic
milieu must make way for new interpretations. One could think, for
instance, of ejoys¥a, adelfo¥, megav. It is remarkable how
ß ı ß ı ¥
ordinary words, when framed in the story of Jesus, become the
language of mystery and resurrection. The simplicity of the words is
in harmony with the intention of the narrator to convince the
audience to accept the system of values of the Kingdom of God as
proclaimed by Jesus.
1. The continuous paradoxical situation of the reader
We have noticed the fact that the first, and most probably also
the second, of the paradoxes are addressed to a wide audience, at
least wider than the group of the Twelve. We noticed as well that all
the paradoxes have a very general formulation, while 10,43-44 is
clearly focused on a particular kind of behavior within the group of
disciples or the Twelve. As such, this creates a double interest of the
paradoxes : they appeal to the responsibility of each individual
person and they express a collective task. With regard to the
practical feasibility of the paradoxes, the importance of this
BOURQUIN, Marc, 93: “Le paradoxe rappelle le lecteur que la direction
51
suggérée par l’auteur s’oppose, en tout point, à ce que les gens estiment normal
et raisonnableâ€; see pp. 93-95 on paradoxes.
D. MARGUERAT, “La construction du lecteur par le texte (Marc et
52
Matthieu) â€, The Synoptic Gospels (ed. C. FOCANT) (BETL 110; Louvain 1993)
239-262, offers a very adequate description of how through his “theology of
paradox †(258, n. 57) Mark disorientates and re-orientates his readers who have
to learn the “vulnerability of all knowledge†(256). It is the narrator’s
conviction that believers should leave behind any kind of privilege or prestige
(258).