Philipp F. Bartholomä, «John 5,31-47 and the Teaching of Jesus in the Synoptics. A Comparative Approach.»
Within Johannine scholarship, the assumed differences between Jesus’ teaching in John and in the Synoptics have frequently led to a negative judgment about Johannine authenticity. This article proposes a comparative approach that distinguishes between different levels of similarity in wording and content and applies it to John 5,31-47. What we find in this discourse section corresponds conceptually to a significant degree with the picture offered in the Synoptics, though couched in a very different idiom. Thus, the comparative evidence does not preclude us from accepting this particular part of Johannine speech material as an authentic representation of the actual content of Jesus’words.
		Biblica_1:Layout 1   21-11-2011    12:59    Pagina 382
            382                      PHILIPP F. BARTHOLOMÄ
            idence for his claims when he states that “the very works that I am
            doing testify on my behalf â€. That these works (including but not
            limited to the miraculous) serve as witnesses to himself is certainly
            the idea behind Jesus’ answer to John the Baptist in Matt 11,4-5
            par. Luke 7,22. Here he points out that his own deeds ought to
            prove his divine identity [0/1–level of closeness] 17. As with John
            5,32 we may again point to Matt 12,28 as a conceptual parallel in
            the synoptic tradition with Jesus referring to his exorcisms done in
            divine power as meaningful witnesses to his own person [0/1-level
            of closeness]. A similar appeal to Jesus’ miracle working as testi-
            mony to his authority can be found in Matt 9,6a par., where the
            healing of a lame man is preceded by the statement, “But so that
            you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to for-
            give sins†[0/1-level of closeness; cf. also Matt 11,20-24 par., as
            well as Matt 8,27 par.; Luke 5,21] 18.
                John 5,36c.37a and 37b take the theme of the Father’s witness
            one step further. Not only does the Father testify indirectly through
            the works of Jesus but “the Father who sent me has himself testified
            on my behalfâ€. Jesus’ self-conception as God’s envoy, the one sent
            by the Father, is clearly a common motif within the three Synoptic
            Gospels (Matt 10,40 par.; Luke 10,16 [0/2-level of closeness]; cf.
            also Matt 15,24; Luke 4,43; as well as the parable of the wicked ten-
            ants in Matt 21,37 par.). The exact referent of the divine testimony
            in 5,37b is difficult to determine. It probably comprises more than
            the voice at Jesus’ baptism (cf. Matt 3,17 par.; 17,5 par.) or the wit-
            ness of Scripture. Taking it in a broader sense as a “general reference
            to all of the Father’s revealing [and thus authorizing] work†19, we
            detect at least some conceptual overlap with the most “Johannineâ€
            of synoptic statements in Matt 11,27 par. Here the divine testimony
            manifests itself in that “all things have been handed over to me by
            my Father†[0/1-level of closeness].
                Despite the Father’s witness, people “do not believe him whom
            he has sentâ€. Charging the crowd in this way with unbelief as found
            here in John 5,38b is, of course, not exclusively Johannine. The
            contrast between receiving divine testimony and not believing (ex-
               17
                  BROWN, John I, 227; cf. for this parallel also the 27NA margin.
               18
                  Matt 12,28 and Matt 9,6a par. are also listed as synoptic parallels to
            John 5,36 in 27NA.
               19
                  CARSON, John, 262.